I'm expecting this movie to suck in a general sense, but, at the same time, I'm curious why some people are talking as if Star Trek is going to be ruined. I'm sorry, but, for me, the series was a mixed bag from the beginning, it then became riddled with even more goofy and contradictory stuff, and it's already well past being ruined after we got Nemesis. From what I'm seeing in this new movie, it's looking to offer a better experience than the worst of what we've gotten in the past. :)
In my mind, all a good (or decent) Star Trek film needs to do is rise above the rest and make you forget about all the crap in the series. It's not like people are going to spend money on a Star Trek film and expect it to change their lives or anything. People know what they're spending their money on and if this movie can achieve only mediocrity, it will still be a good Star Trek film. (Wrath of Khan was the only movie that can truly be considered excellent if you ask me.) We shall see.
Post #337951
- Author
- Tiptup
- Parent topic
- Abrams is Destroying Star Trek like Lucas has Destroyed Star Wars
- Link to post in topic
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/337951/action/topic#337951
- Date created
- 28-Nov-2008, 4:46 PM