Count Dushku said:I need to make a comment before I log back out for a real long time.
The reason why Star Trek began to suck began with TNG. Some hack job liberal writers got together and began to spew their evangelical message with all the fervor of fundamentalists. Sure, Rick Berman has his share of the blame, but the writers were the ones who ultimately burned the ship. It got to be too preachy.
Rick Berman is not a liberal nor were the later-on writers like Brannon Braga.
Both Rick Berman and Brannon Braga are now working on 24 which is a republican show.
Brannon Braga was the worst thing to star trek and I see it as Brannon Braga as the real killer of star trek, not Rick Berman.
The reason why Star Trek began to suck began with TNG is because the real liberal view point which Gene started on the show, died with him.
C3PX said:
Star Trek is the hippies wildest dreams come true.
Star Trek is not hippies wildest dreams come true.
The TOS episode called "The Way to Eden" shows the hippies' vision VS the Star Trek vision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Way_to_Eden
Star Trek is liberal, but not the mainstream so-called liberals like the the Clintons or Obama and so on.
C3PX said:
Star Trek without hippies and liberal messages is like a balloon without helium, sure you can blow it up with just air (or explosions and endless action scenes), but it just doesn't float.
yes, this is true but I would say
Star Trek without the real liberal messages is like a balloon without helium, sure you can blow it up with just air (or explosions and endless action scenes), but it just doesn't float.
But, like I said the liberal side of star trek has real liberal views and not the flase liberal views of people like the Clintons or Obama and so on.
You have to understand that there are two parts to liberals:
1.) The Flase Liberals who called themselves Democrats.
2.) The Real Liberals who hate the The Flase Liberals who called themselves Democrats.
If you think the Clintons or Obama are Liberals, you are wrong. They hide themselves under the name of "Liberal".
Democrats are mainly not real Liberals.
The last Real Liberals in Washington were John F. Kennedy & Bobby Kennedy and you can see what happens to Real Liberals who stand up in Washington.
JJ Abrams is a Democrat (not a real Liberal) and you can see how he is Destroying Star Trek.
It pissed me off that a punk like JJ Abrams used John F. Kennedy's voice for the first Trailer for the bull-shit film which is Star Trek in Name-Only.
I know that this site has alot of Republicans on it and I hope you (Republicans) can start to see different between Real Liberals and Democrats.