Josh said:No maul=Grevious, to that= Fail.
Wait, do you mean Grevious should be Maul, or Grevious shouldn't be Maul?
Also, am I the only one who can't read the posts at the bottom of page 2? Posts 46-50 are gone.
Josh said:No maul=Grevious, to that= Fail.
Wait, do you mean Grevious should be Maul, or Grevious shouldn't be Maul?
Also, am I the only one who can't read the posts at the bottom of page 2? Posts 46-50 are gone.