negative1 said:
ferris209 said:
vbangle said:
Darth Chaltab said:
They're leaving the basic architecture the same as Vista, but I think they're going to target the issues a lot of people had with it.

Which is why this release is *******. Instead of a new $300 OS this should of been SP2 or SP3...regardless it's a complete bend over and take it in the **** moment from Uncle Bill again.....no thanks.

That's my main point, I didn't see anything wrong with making all these improvements to Vista as SP3, even if they wanted to get away from the whole tainted "Vista" name they could have easily had SP3 re-title Vista to Windows 7 and even make the whole SP3 a big marketing campaign, but it all comes down to the almighty dollar.

and you think that since service packs are free, that this major upgrade should be free???

Yes, I do.