I actually Liked George Pal's version better because. It had better actors, and real technical wizardry behind the effects not crap cgi. Oh yeah the best reason no Tom Cruise, second best reason no script by david koepp.

Another pal film that is better than the remake is The Time Machine.

Kind of like how the original planet of the apes is a classic and that remake by burton is all kinds of horrible.

I am expecting nothing less also from the remake of The Day the earth Stood still. The original is such a classic and is probably robert wise best sci fi film. He also made the andromeda strain and star trek the motion picture.

Anyway getting back to Indiana Jones IV Kingdom of the Crystal Numbskull. Can you believe Shia Lebouf actually defended the movie saying it is the same as the first 3 films and the same quality.

Also saying the originals were not real and this one is not real also so they are the same.

Yeah if he was right about Raiders and Last Crusade i would take my dvds and break them and throw them in the trash. But he is wrong because they don't have bad scripts and bad cgi. Also he probably was not even born when Raiders first was in theaters, fucker thinks he can talk. Man these kids who don't know a shit about the real indiana jones movies or the real star wars. They probably think the star wars trilogy premiered in 1997. It is like the same retards who saw Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings and picked up the Tolkien Books thinking they were based on the movie and said. dude that tolkien person changed too much stuff.