I think the big question is if we have a case of lucas knowingly conning people.
Well, let's look at the Star Wars DVD releases.
____
2004 DVD Box Set of the Star Wars trilogy:
Here we have a four disk set (three movies and one bonus disk).
The green are too green and the reds are too red. Black levels are too dark. Very odd coloring of the movies in this set. Now, you may think what hell does this has to do with lucas knowingly conning people. Well, the thing is that it is a lead brick. This Very odd coloring is normal seen in poor cheap dollar DVDs. Go get a color movie from the Dollar Store and you will find that the color levels from dollar DVD are the same as 2004 Star Wars trilogy DVDs. The color correction of the 2004 DVD Box Set is really, really bad but lucas has knowingly put out a bad product (not just once but four times). Also the Box set is called the Star Wars trilogy, but has the Star Wars trilogy Special Editions. It being called the Star Wars trilogy without stating it is the Special Edition versions seems to be made to tricking people into thinking OOT.
______
2005 DVD Box Set of the Star Wars trilogy:
Here we have a Three disk set (three movies and no bonus disk).
Here the con starts becoming clear. Here we have the same DVDs as 2004 with the same bad color errors. Now, lucas put them in a new box which has OOT art work on it. Once again It being called the Star Wars trilogy without stating it is the Special Edition versions and Now it has new OOT art work. All of this really seems like lucas is knowingly conning people into think these are the OOT.
_____
2006 DVDs of the Star Wars trilogy:
Now here another case of lucas is knowingly conning people.
Just like the 2005 DVDs, the 2005 DVDs are Once again It being called the Star Wars trilogy without stating it is the Special Edition versions and it has new OOT art work. The new Con is that these DVDs have the unaltered original theater versions. The thing is that it is NOT the unaltered original theater versions, but is the 1993 laserdisk versions with the original Episode IV opening scroll taken from a 1977 print. Fans have asked lucas for anamorphic Widescreen unaltered original theater versions of the Star Wars trilogy, but lucas knowingly con people by releasing non-anamorphic 1993 laserdisk versions of original theater versions. The DVDs boxes state that they are in widescreen, but the con is that it does not state that the Special Edition versions is the only anamorphic version in the set. The boxes states the Special Edition versions are enhanced for 16:9 TVs and the proof of the con is here. What did lucas use the word "enhanced" and not the word "anamorphic"? This seems to be only to confuse people.
-------------
I ask you: Why did lucas use the word "enhanced" and not the word "anamorphic"?
I ask you: Why did lucas not use the words like anamorphic and non-anamorphic which make it easy to know that the two disks are not the same?
I ask you: Why did lucas not just sell the non-anamorphic 1993 laserdisk versions of original theater versions alone?
I ask you: Why does lucas keeps releasing the Same DVDs with New artwork almost each year?
I ask you: Why lucas keep releasing DVDs (2004 dvds and 2006 dvds) with Errors and Bad Quality.
--------------
I think police need to search Skywalker Ranch to find if lucas has been telling the truth or lying about not having the original masters of the unaltered original theater versions of the Star Wars trilogy.
----------
In the end of the Case of Lucas knowingly conning people could put Lucas behind bars.