skyjedi2005 said:There are films i constantly rewatch and those i don't.
movies i always get around to watching again:
Et
well, i actually agree with some of your points, but you don't seem
to mention the mess made with the 2002 revised CG version of ET?
i'm pretty sure you didn't care for the changes in it right?
Clone encounters of the third kind
must be a psychological thing, 'clone' -> 'close'....
i like this movie, the original that is, they kept releasing more and more
versions of it, with nothing really added, except seeing inside the spaceship, and
more of the aliens etc.... the original is a classic.
star trek movies 1-6
sorry, only the 1st was Ok, and the 2nd was good, i never liked any of the rest of them..
although, once again, the originals are on laserdisc only..
you can only get the new special editions with the cleaned up effects on DVD, i think..
i havent seen to many complaints about that either..
Almost all modern cinema is pure garbage. There will be only three watchable films this year for me Dark Knight, Iron Man
dark knight didn't impress me, i liked the original first two...also iron man was just a poor mans
retelling of 'robocop'.. i can't speak for the bond movie, since i didn't care for 'casino royale' either..
Too bad we owe the era of bad cgi fakery to a mostly entertaining film Jurassic Park. It truly created a monster, made Lucas go gaga for cgi "ooh, ah. Yes that looks faker than it did before i'm sold, how much time and money does it save me."
i find it interesting how you point to a lot of movies by spielberg, (jaws, etc). and yet you
never seem to think he's also at fault for ruining a lot of current series, and using just as much cg
in movies also..
later
-1