negative1 said:
yeah great speilberg..

make a cg movie with a boy, and a 'talking' dog,

that's realism for you...

oh, and have them go to outer space while you're at it..

pot meet kettle..

hypocrite..

i'm glad Lucas kept Spielberg in check for Indy 4,

i can't even imagine what else he would have done to it..

later

-1

LOL, you just like to go against the grain don't you? I think no matter which way the river flowed, you'd always swim against the current. That could be a compliment in some cases, you know, think outside the box, but in your case it isn't so much thinking outside the box as it is disagreeing with and flipping around everything everybody else says. Just an observation.

"I'm glad Lucas kpt Spielberg in check for Indy 4, I can't imagine what else he would have done to it..." That is completely nonsensical. Even taking into account the context of your previous posts and your feelings of Spielberg's incompetence still doesn't explain why or how ypu think he would have screwed up Indy IV had Lucas not been there holdong his leash. I am pretty sure you are only saying it because everybody else says that it was a good thing Spielberg was there to keep Lucas under control.

I also like how you act like Tin Tin being CG is the end of the world, but the Clone Wars being CG is an amazing and very mature show for adults. If Clone Wars can be so great in all its wooden CG glory, why can't CG Tin Tin even be given a chance?