logo Sign In

Post #333583

Author
negative1
Parent topic
Apparently there were message boards discussing the OT back in '83.
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/333583/action/topic#333583
Date created
17-Oct-2008, 12:06 PM

sounds like a review by skyjedi2005...(kidding)

 

_Star_Wars_

                        by Kelvin Thompson

 _Star_Wars_, yet another entry in the recent spate of "Space Operas," is
 a bad, morally empty movie.  Look, quick!!  It has lights!!  It has
 zooming spaceships!!  It has laser flashes!!  It has explosions!!  Look
 closer, and it has nothing.

 

 The plot of _Star_Wars_ is certainly nothing new: a bunch of good guys
 try to overthrow an evil space empire.  Ruling the evil space empire
 are an evil count, James Earl Jones (a Negro), and an evil spaceship
 commander, Peter Cushing (_Dracula_A.D._1972_, _The_Curse_of_
 _Frankenstein_).  Among the good guys are a princess, Carrie Fisher
 (_The_Blues_Brothers, _Shampoo_), an old warrior, Alec Guiness
 (_The_Man_in_the_White_Suit_, _Murder_by_Death_), a young warrior, Mark
 Hammil (_Corvette_Summer_, _Three_Women_), a mercenary, Harrison Ford
 (_Witness_, _The_Conversation_), and assorted robots and aliens.

 From its opening scene, where two spaceships chase each other around a
 planet while trying to blow one another to smithereens, the movie loses
 any semblance of realism.  The spaceships make swishing and humming
 noises as they maneuver about, and their lasers make zapping noises as
 they fire -- all despite the fact that it has been scientifically proven
 that there are absolutely no sounds in space.  

 In another gaffe later in the movie, a robot supposedly manages to go up
 and down a staircase, even though it is quite obvious that it is
 structurally impossible for the robot to do so.  The camera cuts away
 just as the robot gets to the staircase, but the viewer is again jolted
 by the obvious impossiblity.

 

 More important than any scientific error, however, is the glaring lack of
 any moral statement.  In a time of mass starvation in central Africa,
 terrible human-wave battles in the Middle East, repression of civil
 rights in the USSR, legalized racism in South Africa, and rampant
 terrorism everywhere, this movie just hums merrily along in its
 rose-colored glasses.  

 

 For example, when Hammill, the supposed hero of the movie, sees the
 burned corpses of his parents, he responds by turning his head sideways.
 No tears, no shouts of outrage, just a crick in the neck and they are
 forgotten.  Later, when an android buddy of his is discriminated against
 in a space-bar, he accepts the wrong without a blink.  Late in the film,
 when an entire *planet* full of billions of sentient beings is
 annihilated, the good guys just sort of go, "Gosh, that's too bad."  The
 bad guys, of course, smile cruelly.  These kinds of responses to murder,
 discrimination, and genocide certainly do not encourage the kind of
 consciousness needed to overcome today's problems.

 

 _Star_Wars_ contains a lot of action sequences, so it will no doubt have
 a strong draw on today's young people.  Nonetheless, parents should make
 every effort to keep their children away from this morally bankrupt movie
 and direct them toward a film which takes a useful stand on some of the
 issues facing our world.  And, naturally, all ethical adults should stay
 well away from it themselves.

 

later

-1