Rob said:
The appointment of Supreme Court Justices, which will become very relevant in the near future, is the only thing that Republicans are still getting right. There is no doubt that liberal Supreme Court justices intend to strip us of our most basic Constitutonal rights. The recent decision to uphold the Second Ammendment in the state of Washington was decided by a 5 to 4 margin. We are now one Supreme Court justice away from losing this, and all of our other fundemental Constitutional rights.

It was D.C., not Washington State. There's a 3000 mile difference.

The Republican party has been completely hijacked by liberals like McCain and Bush thanks in large part to the type of retards who frequent this thread. Those who are not capable of turning off the "Conservative" talk radio and thinking for themselves have helped to destroy the Republican Party. It now caters to religious retards and weak minded sheep. It needs to be taught a lesson.

You apparently have not been listening to the same Conservative talk radio the rest of us had. Outside of Larry Elder, I can't think of a single Conservative that supported McCain in the beginning. Hannity, Limbaugh, Prager, Levin. Not a single one of those guys supported McCain in the beginning. Even Levin still doesn't support him. Joseph Farrah of WND.com wants every Conservative to vote "None of the above". I don't listen to Limbaugh and Prager on a regular basis, but out of all the ones I've mentioned, only Sean Hannity supports McCain at this time and only because it's a better option than McCain. Even Farrah has said he wouldn't mind seeing Obama win since it would probably mean a real Republican, akin to Ronald Reagan, winning four years from now.

Larry Elder is the only conservative talk radio show I've heard that has consistently supported McCain due to his "electability" vs the other Republican candidates that were running.

Rob said:
Stop being such a faggy cheerleader you dope. Bush is the most prolific spender in our country's history. He spent A LOT more than Clinton did. Your dopey justifications dont change the facts.

I'm not saying he didn't. What I am saying is exactly what Chaltab said. Clinton wanted to spend a lot more money than he did, but the Republicans in Congress wouldn't let him. But let's face it, Bush had a free ride with Republicans in control of everything. We can't just blame Bush. We have to blame all the "Republicans" in Congress as well. They had control and didn't even bother reigning spending in. Yeah, Bush could've vetoed something. I agree it doesn't change the fact that he spent like crazy. It also doesn't change the fact that it was Congressional Republicans that handed him those spending bills.