negative1 said:digitalfreaknyc said:negative1 said:digitalfreaknyc said:Again, let's investigate how all of you are watching these things. Are you watching them on 42" screens? I hate to say it but there's not a single person on here that i'd trust to do an accurate review of any of these. Send them to the professional reviewers with 100"+ screens and then you'll see all the problems with the original mpeg-2 files.
i grant you of course, you can see differences on a 100" screen, is that what you have? ok..
well, i've only got a tiny 32" widescreen...so that's why i don't notice it as much..
later
-1
at 32"...even HD doesn't really matter all that much. With all due respect, you're certainly not in a position to judge.
I have a 60"...almost double yours.
well, when made your blanket statement without clarifying the conditions, that why i wrote
back with my evalution, i never said it was definitive.
later
-1
Well, again, no offense but there's really no point to HD on a small screen. I mean, i have a 32" in my bedroom and, yeah, it looks good but I'm not really judging on something that small. It just looks good. But it's the same thing as looking at some avi's on your computer. Sure, they can look good...but the bigger you blow them up, the crappier they look. Same thing here.