logo Sign In

The 2008 'The Clone Wars' animated theatrical movie - a general discussion thread — Page 8

Author
Time

Really? Only a second later in the detention block, a guard with an imperial trooper helmet takes one in the chest (which is still in the movie). It certainly seems like one of those ratings things, like the big helmet makes the character seem less human, hence the blast impact is ok.

You know of the rebellion against the Empire?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

See that is what is so fucked up about the special editions.

They fixed some matte lines and left other ones still in, removed and censored some violent scenes and left others in.

It is like they either did not notice, were lazy, or this was Lucas half baked attempt at his perfect "vision".

 

Supposedly PG-13 was created because of Temple Of Doom though till this day the movie remains PG.

And Lucas coerced the ratings censors to give Revenge of the Sith a PG-13 though it clearly deserved an R rating for the mustafar scenes, where anakin is dissmembered and burns up in the lava, also the beheading of dooku at the beginning of the movie and anakins murder of children though not shown.

 

Luke Getting his hand cut off in Empire was violent enough in 1980 to get it banned in some countries.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time

Empire was never banned anywhere Skyjedi, it just didn't recieve the PG-equivalent in some territories (for example in many european countries it was rated 14+ or equivalent--though it was often simply just cut instead to get the younger rating) and Lucas didn't coerce anyone on the MPAA to get a PG-13, there is absolutely no way that movie would get an R. AOTC, on the other hand, is about as far as "PG" goes--I think he really pushed to get that one because Star Wars was supposed to be PG material; AOTC is really a PG-13 movie. I think the video-game visuals and high-school acting helped disguise how dark and violent it actually is (for a PG movie, that is).

As for SW, the guy that gets shot in the prison control room is slightly different in that his face is not priminently displayed, and the action happens pretty quickly--the hanger control shootings show the human face as the men get shot much more. Though this isn't something that is part of "the new" Lucas anyway--he had been wanting to change the two hanger bay shootings since at least 1983 and apparently for some time before even that.

Author
Time

Either way, the whole thing is pretty silly.  No matter which version you're watching, the whole thing is over in a fraction of a second and neither version is particularly graphic or violent.  There is no blood, gore, or strong change in appearance to the body.  It's just a red line hitting a chest.  It all happens so fast that I never even noticed the change until seven years after it happened, and only then when I read about it on a website.

Once again, compared to the burning skeletons of Owen and Beru, the numerous losses of limb in later movies, and the whole Anakin burn victim thing, it really makes me wonder why Lucas would feel that strongly about something so minor.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time
Gaffer Tape said:

Once again, compared to the burning skeletons of Owen and Beru, the numerous losses of limb in later movies, and the whole Anakin burn victim thing, it really makes me wonder why Lucas would feel that strongly about something so minor.

 

 I think thats the point. When Owen and Beru get toasted and when Luke gets his hand cut off its supposed to be horrible and impactful; the Imperials you are not supposed to feel anything when they get shot.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

BTW, has anyone seen the SW bobbleheads that they have at McDonalds? It's supposed to be a Clone Wars-tie in, but most of them are actually OT characters, the remainder being PT and Clone Wars characters.

The only OT ones they had available were Wicket on a speederbike and C-3P0 on a landspeeder, so I bought those. The others in the display case were very cool-looking as well (Han on the Falcon, Luke on an X-wing, Leia on the Tantive, Vader on a Tie-fighter, etc.)

I had no idea they had these at McD's until I walked in there today. I haven't seen any ads for them (but then, I don't watch TV shows that are geared towards children).

EDIT: Here's a demo of the toys- just click 'next' to see each one:

SW bobbleheads- Mcdonalds

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Clone Wars was revised downward again.  By about another million.  So if it had a $10 mil budget, it's just barely a success.  Pretty sad that a Star Wars movie premieres in number 3 and makes less than $15 mil opening weekend.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2008&wknd=33&p=.htm

 

Got any pics of those toys Mielr?  Those actually sound pretty cool.  I'll buy pretty much anything OT related these days.  I just avoid all the PT stuff.  I think that sends a strong enough message.

EDIT: Nevermind.  I found a photo on TFN :P  They look...um...funny...in a strange way.

F Scale score - 3.3333333333333335

You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American.

Pissing off Rob since August 2007.
Author
Time
 (Edited)

I don't recall Empire being banned, but several countries did cut that shot out, which probably confused the hell out of people!

There is probably a bit of a double standard with the MPAA when it comes to people being shot by scifi weapons vs. real guns.

Note how a movie like Star Trek 6 gets away with oodles of Klingon blood in a PG film by making it look like pepto bismol. ;)

The original Star Wars movie novelization is actually pretty graphic in some of it's descriptions of stormtroopers getting shot.

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
SilverWook said:

Note how a movie like Star Trek 6 gets away with oodles of Klingon blood in a PG film by making it look like pepto bismol. ;)

Yeah, but also note how Star Trek 6 seems to have inspired every planetary-sized explosion in Star Wars to be accompanied by a giant, fiery ring that causes Sulu to break his tea cup.  Poor Sulu.  Er, I mean, poor Star Wars.

 

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time
SilverWook said:

Note how a movie like Star Trek 6 gets away with oodles of Klingon blood in a PG film by making it look like pepto bismol. ;)

Making bloody scenes black and white, as Tarantino discovered, will also get you around ratings like an NC-17 :)

 

F Scale score - 3.3333333333333335

You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American.

Pissing off Rob since August 2007.
Author
Time

Haters, what did you expect from a movie that is merely 3 episodes of a cartoon strung together?

And to the profit bean counters, Clone Wars is part of a TV series that has already been bought and paid for.  The only costs on the movie are promotion and making the prints. Anything above that is pure profit. I'm sure Lucas is happy.  This movie is really a commercial for the TV show anyway.

Personally I enjoyed the film. I got a kick out of a few of the little jokes, (Zero, lol), and it was pretty much what I expected.  Watch it through the eyes of a child and you'll have fun. I know I did.

On a side note, Clone Wars is head over heels above current kids TV shows like Ben 10, Transformers Animated, etc...  I'm glad the kids have something fun to watch.  I know I will be sure to set my Tivo.

Author
Time
 (Edited)
Crygor64 said:

Haters,

You lost me at haters.  They did that shit at TFN, generalizing about people.  Have a real debate at OT.com, or go to TFN and have lame ass debates labeling people.

You aren't Cryogenic are you?

Author
Time
Crygor64 said:

And to the profit bean counters, Clone Wars is part of a TV series that has already been bought and paid for.  The only costs on the movie are promotion and making the prints. Anything above that is pure profit. I'm sure Lucas is happy.  This movie is really a commercial for the TV show anyway.

...

On a side note, Clone Wars is head over heels above current kids TV shows like Ben 10, Transformers Animated, etc...  I'm glad the kids have something fun to watch.  I know I will be sure to set my Tivo.

Something tells me Cartoon Network didn't buy all 5 seasons in one shot, like Lucas wanted.  I'm sure they bought the movie and one season and are going to see how it does before signing on for more.  We'll see how well the actual TV series does.  Promotional costs are high no matter how you look at it.  If you can't make back your promotional costs from box office grosses, you're looking at a loss.

Clone Wars may be better than that crap, but that doesn't mean that stuff isn't crap too.  There's plenty of good shows for kids of all ages to watch.  We have no trouble finding something for our kid to watch and it doesn't include those shows.  Of course, he's barely two, so he's mostly just watching really little kid shows.

 

F Scale score - 3.3333333333333335

You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American.

Pissing off Rob since August 2007.
Author
Time
CO said:
Crygor64 said:

Haters,

You lost me at haters.  They did that shit at TFN, generalizing about people.  Have a real debate at OT.com, or go to TFN and have lame ass debates labeling people.

You aren't Cryogenic are you?

 

 TFN you say?  You should go back there. I'm sure you are missed.

Author
Time
 (Edited)
Crygor64 said:
CO said:
Crygor64 said:

Haters,

You lost me at haters.  They did that shit at TFN, generalizing about people.  Have a real debate at OT.com, or go to TFN and have lame ass debates labeling people.

You aren't Cryogenic are you?

 

 TFN you say?  You should go back there. I'm sure you are missed.

 

 Well, I was banned there for defending the OOT during the DVD release two years ago as I was trying to tell people that DVD set was a piece of shit and an insult to fans.  Most fans at TFN kept saying to me, "You are getting what you deserve!"   as TFN cleansed themselves from anyone who wasn't a fan of all 6 movies.

But you still didn't answer my question, why must you incorporate 'haters' in your post, when that is a generalization of the fanbase.  And also, are you Cryogenic? 

Hopefully you can answer my questions.....

Author
Time

Well i succomed to my curiosoity and watched TCW. Now i am desperately hoping someone here can help me out with something......

HOW THE HELL CAN I ERASE THIS PIECE OF SHIT FROM MY MEMORY????

I've been a fan of Star Wars since 1977. The PT, though not of the same calibre as the OT, i still enjoyed seeing for the first time. But this... How the hell anyone can say this is good is beyond me.

This should have remained what it was meant to be and that is a TV cartoon series. Releasing 3 episodes strung together is an insult to Star Wars fans. So its supposed to be aimed at kids. So why not just keep it for the TV where the kids can watch it for free? Money, that's the only reason. Lets see.... kids tickets are usually half the price of adult ones so the parents then have to take their kids to the cinema and pay full price. Great, now more money is coming in. Well not from me. I'm just glad i didn't pay to have to sit through this abomination. The fanboy excuse of "see it through a child's eyes" is complete crap.Most  kids that were at the showing were restless and bored, some even leaving half way through. i have never seen this at any other Star Wars movie i have ever watched at the cinema.

What happened to the promise that the animation would "not be like anything we've seen before"? well i, for one, am glad we have never seen anything like it before because the animation was truly outdated. there was just no suspense in any part of the movie. All the battles, we knew who lives, so they became pointless and boring. Why keep flogging the clone wars to death? They could have done so much with an animated series without having to go over old ground.

Lucas screwed up with AOTC when we never got to see the clone wars, as he had promised, so we now get lumbered with this.

Call me a hater as much as you want, but know this before you generalise me.... i wasn't, until now.

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA

Author
Time

I checked rotten tomatoes again today, to see if there were any new reviews up. There are 2 new reviews, both bad (NY Times and Richard Roeper).

For those of you keeping score, it has dipped again to 18% for the T-Meter Critics (down from 19%) and is now at 4% for the Top Critics (down from 5%). http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/clone_wars/?critic=creamcrop

Author
Time
 (Edited)

This movie is an even bigger turkey than x files 2 or mummy 3.

"sucks this movie does" -Richard Roeper intones as yoda.

An even bigger dissapointment and middle finger to the fans than Indiana Jones IV.

 

It is like many reviews have stated an overly bloated video game cutscene and hasbro action figure commercial rolled into one.

It has the most wooden and worst animation i have ever seen, there is no fluid motion and the characters bad dialogue is just as wooden and inane.

 

This is the biggest Turkey with the star wars name on it since the holiday special and the Phantom menace.

Way to go Lucash, i am glad that fans now know just what a hack and lack of imagination you have become these days.

Put a fork in this turkey folks, all that is needed is mash potatoes and gravy and  you get an instant thanksgiving dinner, LOL.  at the wrong time of year.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time

I almost saw CW tonight, but was really tired after seeing Tropic Thunder. (Which really skewers the heck out of Hollywood.) So I can't curse it with every fiber of my being yet.

Look on the bright side, the Rifftrax crew will probably have a field day with it. :)

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

So...what, if anything, does this feeble turnout (sub-Star Trek Nemesis) mean for the original trilogy? I would hope it illustrates that the super-loyal fan base, including the young ones, isn't exactly vast and unlimited, and appealing to the older fans who actually still care maybe isn't such a terrible idea. (I actually would like to see Clone Wars, but I stopped spending $ on Star Wars after the 2006 dvd insult. Although I was weak and bought the Making Of book last year.) Lucasfilm,  I'm SO ready to start spending money on your crap again, just make this right...

Author
Time
adywan said:

Well i succomed to my curiosoity and watched TCW. Now i am desperately hoping someone here can help me out with something......

HOW THE HELL CAN I ERASE THIS PIECE OF SHIT FROM MY MEMORY????

I've been a fan of Star Wars since 1977. The PT, though not of the same calibre as the OT, i still enjoyed seeing for the first time. But this... How the hell anyone can say this is good is beyond me.

This should have remained what it was meant to be and that is a TV cartoon series. Releasing 3 episodes strung together is an insult to Star Wars fans. So its supposed to be aimed at kids. So why not just keep it for the TV where the kids can watch it for free? Money, that's the only reason. Lets see.... kids tickets are usually half the price of adult ones so the parents then have to take their kids to the cinema and pay full price. Great, now more money is coming in. Well not from me. I'm just glad i didn't pay to have to sit through this abomination. The fanboy excuse of "see it through a child's eyes" is complete crap.Most  kids that were at the showing were restless and bored, some even leaving half way through. i have never seen this at any other Star Wars movie i have ever watched at the cinema.

What happened to the promise that the animation would "not be like anything we've seen before"? well i, for one, am glad we have never seen anything like it before because the animation was truly outdated. there was just no suspense in any part of the movie. All the battles, we knew who lives, so they became pointless and boring. Why keep flogging the clone wars to death? They could have done so much with an animated series without having to go over old ground.

Lucas screwed up with AOTC when we never got to see the clone wars, as he had promised, so we now get lumbered with this.

Call me a hater as much as you want, but know this before you generalise me.... i wasn't, until now.

 

Since your little "fanboy jab was directed at me I'll just say this:

Your "Star Wars Revisited" is merely "Star Wars: The Extra Special Edition."  So by OT.com standards your opinion on this matter is invalid.  You are as bad as Lucas if not worse.  You know what would make Star Wars even better?  More Tie Fighters! (lol)

We need less childish drama over this kids movie.  Didn't like it?  Too bad. Stop acting like Lucas has slighted you personally.  Some of you just need to let it go. 

This isn't like Greedo shooting first.  This isn't the Prequel Trilogy.  Its a kids movie.  Its fun and incredibly stupid.  Some of you have forgotten how to experience joy.  Others are just too old for this shit.  Most people who saw the original SW in the theaters are at or over 40 years old.  That's your problem right there.  Well that and a complete lack of youthful imagination.

Author
Time
 (Edited)
Crygor64 said:
adywan said:

Well i succomed to my curiosoity and watched TCW. Now i am desperately hoping someone here can help me out with something......

HOW THE HELL CAN I ERASE THIS PIECE OF SHIT FROM MY MEMORY????

 

Call me a hater as much as you want, but know this before you generalise me.... i wasn't, until now.

 

Since your little "fanboy jab was directed at me I'll just say this:

Your "Star Wars Revisited" is merely "Star Wars: The Extra Special Edition."  So by OT.com standards your opinion on this matter is invalid.  You are as bad as Lucas if not worse.  You know what would make Star Wars even better?  More Tie Fighters! (lol)

We need less childish drama over this kids movie.  Didn't like it?  Too bad. Stop acting like Lucas has slighted you personally.  Some of you just need to let it go. 

This isn't like Greedo shooting first.  This isn't the Prequel Trilogy.  Its a kids movie.  Its fun and incredibly stupid.  Some of you have forgotten how to experience joy.  Others are just too old for this shit.  Most people who saw the original SW in the theaters are at or over 40 years old.  That's your problem right there.  Well that and a complete lack of youthful imagination.

 <yawn>

Please don't feed the troll.

 

Pink Floyd -- First in Space

Author
Time

Oh noes! I'm a troll now.  Pathetic.

When the Special Editions arrived and the hardcore fanbase compained I was among those who complained the loudest.  It wasn't just the "Han shoots first" stuff.  I was outraged because Lucas was trying to permanently erase something that was part of my life for almost 17 years.  From the point of view of someone who respects film history it was a crime.

At least when Spielberg rehased E.T. he gave us both versions on DVD.  Much like Stalin, Lucas seems content to any bit of history he doesn't agree with.

Lucas also seems obsessed with adding things to the older films that weren't needed in the first place.

However the drama over this goofy and many times stupid kids movie astounds and amuses me. Just look at some of the lulz worthy posts in this thread. The hysteria is hilarious. 

Some people just need a reason to bitch.  Some people just want to blame George for their disappointment with their own pathetic lives.  I'm not defending clone wars as much as I'm laughing at the people who are so offended by a silly kids film. (And like we said before, its not even a movie, its 3 episodes of a TV show strung together.)

You can go back to whining now.

 

 

Author
Time

Since your little "fanboy jab was directed at me I'll just say this:

Your "Star Wars Revisited" is merely "Star Wars: The Extra Special Edition."  So by OT.com standards your opinion on this matter is invalid.  You are as bad as Lucas if not worse.  You know what would make Star Wars even better?  More Tie Fighters! (lol)

We need less childish drama over this kids movie.  Didn't like it?  Too bad. Stop acting like Lucas has slighted you personally.  Some of you just need to let it go. 

This isn't like Greedo shooting first.  This isn't the Prequel Trilogy.  Its a kids movie.  Its fun and incredibly stupid.  Some of you have forgotten how to experience joy.  Others are just too old for this shit.  Most people who saw the original SW in the theaters are at or over 40 years old.  That's your problem right there.  Well that and a complete lack of youthful imagination.

for gods sake, grow up and go back to TFN. it wasn't directed at you at all. Actually what you said was almost word for word from other sites so it was a generalised quote.  And just because i have done a fan edit of the SE doesn't make my opinion on the Clone Wars invalid at all. Maybe you should do some research about the edit and about me before your childish attacks. You have just proved you know nothing at all, which makes your comments a lot more invalid than mine ever could be. sheesh, i guess you were bottle fed.

You just don't get it do you. It has nothing to do with how old someone is. If i had become too old and have no youthful imagination then i wouldn't still like Star Wars would i? and i also wouldn't have like the original Clone Wars cartoon either or anything else that specifically aimed at kids, but i do. This movie was horrendous , no matter how old you are. but there are still people out there that will say its good just because it has the tag "Star Wars" and will continue to defend any piece of crap that Lucas keeps on putting out. If this was good then i would have said that it was, but it wasn't and the majority of the world tend to agree.

And i probably have more "youthful imagination" as you call it than you ever could. and i did see it through a childs eyes: an 8 year old kid who loves Sci-Fi & Star Wars but hated the movie. And isn't the best critic for a movie aimed at kids is a child? enough said.

 

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA