GhostAlpha26 said:

I think # 1,4 & 6 are very important points. The movie took an iconic character and totally rewrite him, unnecessarily. It was not the batman I know and they did not do a good job in "evolving" or changing how he is in my opinin.

#10. I agree with that, especially with the ending, it was done poor. Dispatching Two-Face so quickly and not allowly the chance to further develope his chracter in the next movie was a complete failure. Saving the Joker and not wrapping up his story was terrible.

The movie didnt seem "grounded," it was flmisy and all over the place. Batman falls about 20+ stories with Rachel, doesnt use any gadgets to save them and they are completely uninjuried. Batman falls ~5 stories at the end and has trouble getting up.

People talk like they have watched this amazingly well done movie and its full of scenes and situations that are really poorly done that youd have to be blind not to see. I dont know what people saw.

I'll agree that two face was taken out a bit to quick, but I think the point of keeping Joker alive was to have him for the next movie (not gonna work out unfortunately unless they go with a different actor).

As far as the two falls go, I swear I heard Batman activate something (his wing thing maybe?) during his fall with Rachel that at least slowed them down. That's why he was able to get under her and provide some cushion when they hit. Otherwise I'd agree with you.