Max_Rebo said:2.) Vader is the full real vader from the OT and not Anakin Skywalker played by Hayden Christensen.
Is that really a good thing? Seeing Vader in ROTS was the worst bit of the PT, do you really think having a whole movie of him wouldn't completely destroy the character.
Hunter says: In GL's ROTS, it was not the full real vader from the OT, it was Heyden-Vader. In GL's ROTS, It was the not another actor. also GL's ROTS's Vader sucked becuase it is linked to Heyden's Vader and GL's ROTS's Vader first words are "where's Padme". That what I am saying it need to be more a Prequel to EP IV Idea and not a Sequel to GL's EP II. That what I am saying it need to nine years after other Lucas' bad Films.
3.) It is about the Dark Times inwhich the full real vader from the OT hunts down the jedi and not Anakin Skywalker (vader in name only) played by Hayden Christensen.
well casting is a completely different subject any idea could be ruined by bad casting.
Hunter says: I am not talking casting here. I am talking about it been about the Dark Times. The story I am writing about is years after Anakin Skywalker. Hayden Christensen not playing vader is a side note.
4.) No Padme and her bad lines.
Again writing is could be rubbish regardless of the basic plot
Hunter says: Ok, I am Sorry and i rewrite that.
4.) No Padme which means none of Portman's bad acting. Portman's bad acting and Christensen's bad acting is one of the things which made the Prequels sucked. I thinking with the full real vader from the OT voice by Old James E. Jones (who is a good actor) with a better story then GL's EP III. I mainly writing about making a Better plot.
5.) Obi Wan is in hiding and on the run from the Empire.
So Obi-wan is in hiding, that really doesn't sound very exciting
Hunter says: Obi Wan is in hiding and on the run from the Empire. that really doesn't sound very exciting to you. Yes, the Obi Wan is in hiding is not exciting, but Obi Wan on the run from the Empire is exciting. It means that Obi-wan leaves his hiding planet, in doing so he has to run from and battles the Empire.
The real problem with the idea is what would the story be? all you've specified is a time period, and unfortunately in establish continuity not much is happening during that period, Anakin has already fallen to the darkside and become Vader, the Republic has already fallen to the Empire, the twins are in hidding, their mother is dead and the rebellion has yet to do anything significant as the capture of the Death Star plans was "their first Victory". So all that's really left is the Jedi Purge and watching Vader hunt down Jedi for 2 hours just sound boring.
For me a much more effective way to avoid the continuity errors created by ROTS would be to end the prequels earlier and end on a cliff hanger and then the details of what really happened would be filled in while watching the OT, you would never see Anakin and Obi-wans duel and Vader would only appear in teh OT, but by the end of Episode 6 you would know all the details. This way the PT could focus on Anakin the Hero, the great Warrior.
I principle I think I agree with your intention but I just don't think we need to see Vader before his enterance in Episode 4.
the Jedi Purge and watching Vader hunt down Jedi for 2 hours is not what I am talking about.
Iam talking about:
the rebellions first battles to stop the Empire before EP IV.
Obi-wan leaves his hiding planet, in doing so he has to run from and battles the Empire.
The Empire in full war machine mode.
Vader killing the last of the jedi.
Vader battles Obi-wan and ending in which we think Obi-wan is the last to die. (But, Then in EV IV you learn that Obi-wan did not die.)
I do not like PT too and think we do not need to see Vader before EV IV also.
But, the prequel have been made and all i'm saying is Ep III should have been Better and truer to the OT.
EP III was the last time to made for a good new prequel star Wars film and it failed