DarkGryphon2048 said:
As I've said before, the films should've been slightly longer, ToD taken place in 1934 instead of 1935 and Short Round is alright by me. Yeah Willie Scott gets on my nerves the same way she does Indiana.
This seems like a very poor "fan-edit" as it is and seems more personal compared to an actual one. Not interested in the slightest.
So stick with what you're best at. Re-edit the Star Wars films to your hearts content but of course I vastly prefer Indiana Jones compared to the former.
As I've said before, the films should've been slightly longer, ToD taken place in 1934 instead of 1935 and Short Round is alright by me. Yeah Willie Scott gets on my nerves the same way she does Indiana.
This seems like a very poor "fan-edit" as it is and seems more personal compared to an actual one. Not interested in the slightest.
So stick with what you're best at. Re-edit the Star Wars films to your hearts content but of course I vastly prefer Indiana Jones compared to the former.
Fan edits are personal projects rather than the commercial ones you see in the cinemas anyway. They use the original movies as a canvas to explore a different point of view, so no fan edit can be construed as poor - poorly executed perhaps, but if the ideas are sound, then there wouldn't be any problem with slightly off execution.
Besides, what's the difference between a personal fan edit and a 'proper' fan edit? Don't they both use personal choices to hopefully make a better movie? For instance, why does ToD need to take place exactly 2 years before Raiders? It's a prequel episode and could have taken part 2 weeks before Raiders for all I care...it's just a story set before Raiders. Surely, if you had edited it to be 1934 instead of 1935, that would be a personal choice, not the correct one...?