ChainsawAsh said:
If this is true, it certainly didn't feel like it. In my opinion, the vast majority of the film was shot on sets and locations. If much of this film was shot green-screen, I'll drop out of film school and flip burgers at McDonald's for the rest of my life - only one or two things (the swordfight and "skull room," I believe) even remotely felt green-screened. The rest certainly had the on-set/on-location feel to it, unlike 85% of "Attack of the Clones" or 98% of "Revenge of the Sith."
If this is true, it certainly didn't feel like it. In my opinion, the vast majority of the film was shot on sets and locations. If much of this film was shot green-screen, I'll drop out of film school and flip burgers at McDonald's for the rest of my life - only one or two things (the swordfight and "skull room," I believe) even remotely felt green-screened. The rest certainly had the on-set/on-location feel to it, unlike 85% of "Attack of the Clones" or 98% of "Revenge of the Sith."
I agree, this movie did not feel like the CGI-infested PT movies. I always thought TPM holds up pretty well because that does have real locations like Tatooine, but AOTC & ROTS are just loaded with green-screen environments like Mustafar, Geonosis, Utapau, and Kamino. I read many comments about the CGI in Indy IV, and was fearing the PT, part 2, but I have to say the CGI didn't overwhelm me, although it is still an average movie.