logo Sign In

Post #319370

Author
zombie84
Parent topic
Indiana Jones IV
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/319370/action/topic#319370
Date created
29-May-2008, 1:02 PM
Tiptup said:

canofhumdingers said:


Finally, cgi has also led to the advent of "digital editing" (is that what it's called?) where filmmakers can literally splice two seperate takes together to get the performance they desire. I remember seeing this on some "making of" for one of the prequels. Lucas maybe liked take 2 for Anakin, but liked take 6 for Obi-wan. Instead of trying to coax each actor into giving the desired results together in one take by giving them good direction & feedback, Lucas was able to just splice those two takes together in editing. IMO, this just KILLS any chance of getting good chemistry between the actors. It's not something I think Speilberg would or has used, but it is something cgi has brought about & it's a concept I utterly detest.


Peter Jackson used that a lot for the Lord of the Rings. You can notice a lot of little details changing from one view to another here and there. The worst is when Boromir dies in fellowship since the location of their hands changes back and forth (it ruins the drama for me).


What you are talking about is back and forth editing, and since most dialog scenes are not shot with coverage of both people at once this is normal. What canofhumdingers is talking about is isolating actors WITHIN the same shot--if there is a wideshot of two people, Lucas would digitally rotoscope Liam Neeson from take 3 into a shot of Ewan McGregor from take 1, so that both actors oncamera at the same time are not actually oncamera at the same time but spliced together from different takes of the same shot.