Tarzan because Edgar Rice Burroughs tale inspired elements of both star wars and Indiana Jones.
If your gonna get mad at a director for bad ripoff scenes or homages to other films you must hate the film transformers and Michael Bay. that movie references so many other movies you lose count, it is actually silly.
As for all the fake cgi George Dismantled and sold off the old physical effects unit.
Plus many coming out of university and trained in the field of special effects these days are all digital trained and not traditionally trained.
Many of the old ilm'ers arre either retired or work exclusively with computers sadly.
To do a big film like any of the original star wars trilogy films or indiana jones films would be almost impossible. their are nobody trained to do traditional matte painting on glass, cinematography on film, or model builders anymore. ALL the universitys teach cgi and green screen since that is where hollwood went in terms of filmaking.
Sure Lucas could have rehired all the old team who did those films but cgi is more cost effective.
You don't have to fly away to expensive location or pay extras just make it all in the computer.
If you compare the two different ilm special effects books. one is exclusively traditional effects which a few early computer graphics like star trek II genesis effect or star wars trench run. Then you get to the second published book by Mark Cotta Vaz which is called into the digital realm and its focus is exclusively cgi.
The first book is a beatiful work of art, the second book is complete garbage unless you like fake cgi. which needs to be updated every couple of years versus traditional effects from more than twenty years ago that hold up well and do not draw attention to themselves, they only enhance the story.
They don't take you out of the movie by loudly shouting "HEY LOOK AT ME I"M A SPECIAL EFFECT!!"
in george's own words "a special effect without a story is a pretty boring thing" - From Star Wars to Jedi
Turns out the prequels were a special effect without a story, LOL. which proves the man changed from then to now.
I have no problem with them using cgi for what traditional techniques cannot accomplish. In terms of enhancing a story and blending the digital with the traditional so it is seamless.
As for the Indiana Jones films starting out with Indy on an unrelated adventure not relevent to the plot, as used in raiders and temple of doom was lifted from the bond movies.