Fang Zei said:
I would think the reason you'd get roughly equivalent picture quality on either the DC laserdisc or the GOUT is the following:
DC laserdisc
pro: It's analog, and therefore uncompressed
con: it's analog, you need a top of the line player to make sure the laser is reading the track as accurately as it can.
GOUT
pro: it's digital, so the laser either reads it or it doesn't.
con: it's digital, so it's a compressed mpeg.
Makes sense.I would think the reason you'd get roughly equivalent picture quality on either the DC laserdisc or the GOUT is the following:
DC laserdisc
pro: It's analog, and therefore uncompressed
con: it's analog, you need a top of the line player to make sure the laser is reading the track as accurately as it can.
GOUT
pro: it's digital, so the laser either reads it or it doesn't.
con: it's digital, so it's a compressed mpeg.