Its shot by Kaminsky. Thats his style.
I'm very aware of this. I'm just stating that it should have matched the older films.
I'm sick of this new style of cinematography, and I wished Indy4 would look just as old and classy as the older ones. Bah.
And, I don't think it's an update. To me, cinematography can't be "updated"... sure it can "look" like a 2000s movie, but that doesn't mean it's "improved" from previous generation's styles of lighting. I think if they kept it as close as possible to the older films (visually), it would be so much more "creative", really... because no one does that anymore; and to do that would be a very pleasant surprise. It would feel more "fresh"... don't you think?