logo Sign In

Cop Attacks Skateboarder, For Calling Him "Dude" — Page 3

Author
Time
Sweeney,where do you get off? Are you just bent on disrupting all conversation on these boards? I said let's make peace, and then you start acting like even more of an ass.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Real English biscuits are awsome. Nanner, depending on the size of your area, there is likely an import store around somewhere. Most decent sized towns have one hiding around someplace. They are usually have things like McVitie's. They are usually way over priced though... they prey upon desperate foreigners seeking a taste of home and world travelers unfortunately enough to have tasted and fallen in love with products not generally sold or produced on their continent. Man, now I have a hankering for a good European beer and foods that just aren't quite the same in the states. I wonder how long it will be before they invent site to site transporters... how great would it be to zip over to Italy for lunch and zip back when you're done.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
Originally posted by: C3PX
Sweeney,where do you get off? Are you just bent on disrupting all conversation on these boards? I said let's make peace, and then you start acting like even more of an ass.


I'm the one who said "lets just leave each other alone. Then you started making jokes. You have strange way of making peace. Jerk.

deleted, I think I went too far.
Author
Time
Wasn't making jokes about you. You paranoid or something? Not every discussion around here revolves around you.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
then just who was Nanner refering to here?

Originally posted by: Nanner Split
He's a total biscuit, man. Just let him go.


deleted, I think I went too far.
Author
Time
Well see, we had this user named TotalBiscuit who came here once to cause a ruckus (see the thread I linked to earlier). So now, whenever someone is being rather absurd, we refer to them as a total biscuit. This doesn't just apply to just forum members. For instance, Jack Thompson would be a total biscuit.

http://i.imgur.com/7N84TM8.jpg

Author
Time
ah ha! so you were indeed calling me a total biscuit, after I(and not CP3X) tried to make peace.
deleted, I think I went too far.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Sweeney599
ah ha! so you were indeed calling me a total biscuit, after I(and not CP3X) tried to make peace.


http://www.eatingwell.com/recipes/img/recipe_images/BG3231.JPG

http://i.imgur.com/7N84TM8.jpg

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Sweeney599
ah ha! so you were indeed calling me a total biscuit, after I(and not CP3X) tried to make peace.

Yes, you said,

Originally posted by: Sweeney599I'm no young kid looking for attention, and I don't want your pity. Lets just leave each alone.


And I posted saying that just because we don't agree politically doesn't mean we have to disagree on everything else. I told you that I do not enjoy picking on you and that I was not going to do it anymore and that you had my respect. So yeah, I did try to make peace with you. I am not trying to take credit for your initive to peace making.

Then Nanner told me not to even bother trying to make peace with you, because you were a "total biscuit", which is our term for someone who tries to stir up trouble, or says absurd things. It is not that big of an insult, and even if it was a huge insult, I am not the one who said it. None of my responses from then on have had anything to do with you at all, up until you started calling us jerks and telling us to shut the fuck up. Nanner did call you a total biscuit, and his total biscuit comment got us talking about the real total biscuit and remembering old times.

I am probably wasting time spelling all this out to you. Calm down, take it easy, we do have more entertaining things to talk about than you. In fact, I am getting pretty sick of talking about you, no offense, but you just arn't that interesting of a person.

So, let's try this getting along thing again, shall we? If you have no interest in trying to get along, maybe you ought to find another forum. The forum at this site, http://wcradio.com/, I have heard are quite good.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
fine, you stop insulting me, I'll stop insulting you. But if someone starts it up again, I'll finish it.
deleted, I think I went too far.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Nanner Split
Originally posted by: HotRod


This pic makes me want my cup of Tea and digestives....mmmm.

But if you really wanted an English biscuit you should try Rich Tea....

http://www.the-word-is-not-enough.com/blog/rob/images/Biscuits.jpg


I just did a search for those and found a site called ukgoods.com , and I may just have to order some. I don't think anything I've seen on that site is sold over here, (remember, we don't get chocolate hobnobs or anything like that).

I noticed Walker's had some pretty bizarre varieties of crisps, especially compared to over here: Pickled Onion (Monster Munch), Prawn Cocktail, Roast Chicken, Smoky Bacon, Steak & Onion, and Worcester Sauce.


ukgoods.com....great site. If I ever moved to the states, I at least know where to get my goodies. Gotta have my biscuits with a nice cup of tea in the evening. Dark Chocolate digestives are my fave, and salt n vinegar or smoky bacon for the crisps.

Just seen they do all the chocolates too. Can't beat cadburys for the chocs....curly wurly...but galaxy caramel is just so yum God...I sound like a right fat greedy porker!!




http://www.facebook.com/DirtyWookie

Author
Time
Would you say there's anything on that site that I should definitely just stay away from? Like I said, I don't think I've even so much as seen any of that stuff up close, much less purchased any.

I didn't see Bovril on there though, now that I think about it.

http://i.imgur.com/7N84TM8.jpg

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
Also, there appears to be an ordinance in that city that prohibits skateboarding. So yeah, maybe there are murderers, rapists, and drug dealers around, but that cop is patrolling that area and those kids were clearly violating a local ordinance.

Sieg Heil.

Oh, so it's ok to violate the law if you don't like it? Well then, I'll just come over there and take all your belongings. What's that you say? That's not fair? Who said anything about fair?

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi

Did the arresting officer perform his job appropriately?


nope. It is never appropriate for a barbaric animal to strangle to kids. He could have seriously injured them or killed them.


It is appropriate. Neither you nor I know what those kids really might have had for one. For another, as Ferris said, he wasn't strangling them. I grabbed them around the neck and back in order to get them on the ground. If those officers showed up on my front door with my kids, I'd first thank the officers and then give my kid a nice grounding. He'd probably be grounded for at least 3 months. No tv, phone, skateboard, computer (except for school work), or anything. The child would spend less than 24 hours in jail, but he'd spend the next 3 months in his home prison.

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
Even if you think the cop is wrong, you stop and take your complaint before a judge. If you're in the right, you'll be vindicated.


ha! tell that to Rodney King! What kind of fantasy world are you living in? Courts don't always make the right decisions.


You mean this Rodney King? The one who was awarded $3.8 million for the beating? The one who, even though the article doesn't mention it, was high on PCP at the time. Seriously, watch that video. There's no way you'd even be able to move if you weren't high on PCP. This is the same Rodney King that already had a criminal record at that time. And he had been in a high speed chase leading up to that incident. $3.8 million sounds like a pretty high level of vindication to me, even though I don't think he deserved a dime. You do know that if he had just laid still they would have stopped hitting him.
F Scale score - 3.3333333333333335

You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American.

Pissing off Rob since August 2007.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: lordjedi
Oh, so it's ok to violate the law if you don't like it?

that is not what I meant. I meant that we should show a little common sense. These only kids riding skateboards, not thieves coming into my house taking my belongings. What do you want cops to do? beat everyone over the head for every little infraction of the law they make? I think your head would get very sore.

Originally posted by: lordjedi
It is appropriate. not

Originally posted by: lordjedi
Neither you nor I know what those kids really might have had for one yeah right, I'm sure that had uzies and Glocks on them. Also, its called frisk, not strangle.

Originally posted by: lordjedi
For another, as Ferris said, he wasn't strangling them. I grabbed them around the neck and back in order to get them on the ground. what Ferris says and what my eyes see are too different things. My eyes saw the cop strangle two kids.


Originally posted by: lordjedi
You mean this Rodney King? yep the one who the cops beat the shit out of.

Originally posted by: lordjedi
even though the article doesn't mention it, was high on PCP at the time.
that is not an excuse for police brutality.

Originally posted by: lordjedi
This is the same Rodney King that already had a criminal record at that time.
nor is that

Originally posted by: lordjedi
And he had been in a high speed chase leading up to that incident.
nor is that

Originally posted by: lordjedi
$3.8 million sounds like a pretty high level of vindication to me
the cops got acquitted in the criminal case.

Originally posted by: lordjedi
I don't think he deserved a dime.
both the Mayor and DA of LA at the time, disagree with. So does a lot of America.

Originally posted by: lordjedi
You do know that if he had just laid still they would have stopped hitting him
funny it looks as if that is exactly what he did, and they continued to beat him. It is clear the cops went too far.

none of this really as any bearing on my point that is is possible to lose your case in court even when you are in the right.






deleted, I think I went too far.
Author
Time
The point is that the cop used massively excessive force preportional to the crime. The man obviously has some anger issues for him to show such aggression over a minor, and rather common, by-law infraction committed by barely-teenagers. Its not like he beat the shit out of someone or anything--but the point is that the potential is there. If he reacts this way to a freaking kid who is skateboarding in a park, its not a stretch to imagine him pulling a Rodney King. And thats something the public should be concerned about. Police officers shouldn't be man-handling 14 year old kids for skateboarding.
Author
Time
true. But right now, we have been talking about the second video, not the first. I think most here agree that the cop in the first video went too far.
deleted, I think I went too far.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
Oh, so it's ok to violate the law if you don't like it?

that is not what I meant.

You're the one that used the term sig heil. It's not very fun when your comments are taken out of context, is it?

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
It is appropriate. not

What a big powerful argument that was. Not!

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
Neither you nor I know what those kids really might have had for one yeah right, I'm sure that had uzies and Glocks on them. Also, its called frisk, not strangle.

No, it's called get control of the situation first. If someone is fighting you, you get control of them first, then you frisk them. How do you know if they had a knife or not? They don't need to have a gun to be a threat.

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
For another, as Ferris said, he wasn't strangling them. I grabbed them around the neck and back in order to get them on the ground. what Ferris says and what my eyes see are too different things. My eyes saw the cop strangle two kids.

GET YOUR FUCKING EYES CHECKED THEN ASSHOLE!!!! My eyes saw a cop grab two kids by their back and neck in order to get control of the situation.


Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
You mean this Rodney King? yep the one who the cops beat the shit out of.

The one that was awarded $3.8 million dollars for said beating.

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
even though the article doesn't mention it, was high on PCP at the time. that is not an excuse for police brutality.


It is an excuse when you feel like your life could be in danger. Have you ever talked to a cop that's been faced with someone coming at them that is clearly high on PCP? It takes billy clubs and several tasers to take the person down, so it's a very scary situation.

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
This is the same Rodney King that already had a criminal record at that time.
nor is that


Criminal records do mean a lot. Hence why we now have a 3 strikes law in California. Criminal records go to your history and show what you're likely to do.

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
And he had been in a high speed chase leading up to that incident.
nor is that


That showed that he was trying to get away. Add that to his criminal record and they didn't know what to expect.

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
$3.8 million sounds like a pretty high level of vindication to me
the cops got acquitted in the criminal case.


I don't really give a fuck you little prick. He got $3.8 million dollars and then proceeded to break the law some more at a later date. He even tried to sue again at that later date except the cops were a little smarter and didn't beat him up.

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
I don't think he deserved a dime.
both the Mayor and DA of LA at the time, disagree with. So does a lot of America.


And a lot of America (about half of it) thought slavery was ok. And a lot of America wanted to be ruled by the King of England back in 1775. Just because "a lot of America" disagrees with something, doesn't make them right. And the mayor and DA pretty much gave in to avoid any further public outrage. "No justice, no peace"? What the hell is that? A white man gets beaten and nobody cares. A black man gets beaten and people riot in the streets destroying their neighborhood. Who's in the right on that one smartass?

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
You do know that if he had just laid still they would have stopped hitting him
funny it looks as if that is exactly what he did, and they continued to beat him. It is clear the cops went too far.


Watch the fucking tape clearly jackass. It's quite obvious that he attempted to get up several times only to be hit and told "Stay down!" each and every time!

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
none of this really as any bearing on my point that is is possible to lose your case in court even when you are in the right.


And we have appeals courts for that. The POINT is that there is a SYSTEM in place for "righting a wrong" and that doesn't involve running from the cops or trying to fight them.
F Scale score - 3.3333333333333335

You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American.

Pissing off Rob since August 2007.
Author
Time
I'll get to all of this tomorrow.
deleted, I think I went too far.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Sweeney599
I'll get to all of this tomorrow.


Oh no, we're all so scared.

You're a fucking retard.
F Scale score - 3.3333333333333335

You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American.

Pissing off Rob since August 2007.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Nanner Split
Would you say there's anything on that site that I should definitely just stay away from? Like I said, I don't think I've even so much as seen any of that stuff up close, much less purchased any.

I didn't see Bovril on there though, now that I think about it.




Back on topic

Anything Cadbury's is good...Caramel, Curly wurly....Mcvities Biscuits...I like the plain chocolate myself...the caramel version is too sickly, unless you smoke shit loads of weed and have a munchies attack, then pretty much anything on that site is lovely Oh, and you'll need to get some Tea as well...We use Typhoo at home..."You get an ooh with Typhoo"


Oh God...





http://www.facebook.com/DirtyWookie

Author
Time
Originally posted by: HotRod
salt n vinegar or smoky bacon for the crisps.
Yeah, they are the best flavours man.

Originally posted by: HotRod
unless you smoke shit loads of weed and have a munchies attack, then pretty much anything on that site is lovely


Salt and vinegar crisps combined with cadburys dairy milk works surprisingly well...

War does not make one great.

Author
Time
Originally posted by: FanFiltration
People to contact...

Mayor Sheila Dixon
City Hall, Room 250
100 N. Holliday Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
Phone (410) 396-3835
Fax (410) 576-9425
Baltimore PD: 410-396-2411
Maryland States Attorneys Office at 1-410-396-4001
citizens review board410-396-3141
these are the people they have to answer to!!


Hahaha, why the Hell would anyone waste their time emailing that department?

They don't give a rat's ass about your emails.

Harrison Ford Has Pretty Much Given Up on His Son. Here's Why

Author
Time
Originally posted by: lordjedi
You're the one that used the term sig heil. It's not very fun when your comments are taken out of context, is it? bla bla bla. at least when you do it, I don't act like a cry baby.

Originally posted by: lordjedi

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
It is appropriate. not

What a big powerful argument that was. Not!

it may not have been big or powerful, but it was correct.

Originally posted by: lordjedi

No, it's called get control of the situation first. If someone is fighting you, you get control of them first, then you frisk them. How do you know if they had a knife or not? They don't need to have a gun to be a threat.

it was an out of control situation because the cops overreacted. There has to be a better way of controlling the situation than strangling two kids.

Originally posted by: lordjedi

GET YOUR FUCKING EYES CHECKED THEN ASSHOLE!!!! My eyes saw a cop grab two kids by their back and neck in order to get control of the situation. then I guess we will have to agree to disagree.
Originally posted by: lordjedi

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
You mean this Rodney King? yep the one who the cops beat the shit out of.

The one that was awarded $3.8 million dollars for said beating. yep, after the cops were acquitted.

Originally posted by: lordjedi

It is an excuse when you feel like your life could be in danger. Have you ever talked to a cop that's been faced with someone coming at them that is clearly high on PCP? It takes billy clubs and several tasers to take the person down, so it's a very scary situation. the point is, after it was clear he was "down", they continued to hit him. that is excessive force.


Originally posted by: lordjedi

Criminal records do mean a lot. Hence why we now have a 3 strikes law in California. Criminal records go to your history and show what you're likely to do. true but is still no excuse for continuing to beat him after you have him under control.

Originally posted by: lordjedi

That showed that he was trying to get away. Add that to his criminal record and they didn't know what to expect.
same as above

Originally posted by: lordjedi

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: lordjedi
$3.8 million sounds like a pretty high level of vindication to me
the cops got acquitted in the criminal case.


I don't really give a fuck you little prick. He got $3.8 million dollars and then proceeded to break the law some more at a later date. He even tried to sue again at that later date except the cops were a little smarter and didn't beat him up.


well I do give a fuck. it goes to my original point for bringing Rodney Kind up: that even when you are right, the court could still rule against you.


Originally posted by: lordjedi

And a lot of America (about half of it) thought slavery was ok. And a lot of America wanted to be ruled by the King of England back in 1775. Just because "a lot of America" disagrees with something, doesn't make them right.
true. but in the Rodney King case, I believe that "a lot of America" was right.

Originally posted by: lordjedi
And the mayor and DA pretty much gave in to avoid any further public outrage.
maybe or maybe it is how they truly felt.

Originally posted by: lordjedi
"No justice, no peace"? What the hell is that? A white man gets beaten and nobody cares. A black man gets beaten and people riot in the streets destroying their neighborhood. Who's in the right on that one smartass?
this happened because there has been a long history of black men getting beaten up and lynched and etc and nobody caring. When the Rodney King ruling came down, people just got fed up. It is of course no excuse for beating up and innocent white man. Neither are right.

Originally posted by: lordjedi

Watch the fucking tape clearly jackass. It's quite obvious that he attempted to get up several times only to be hit and told "Stay down!" each and every time!
I guess we are watching different tapes. Because I saw him just laying there while they beat him.

Originally posted by: lordjedi

Originally posted by: Sweeney599
none of this really as any bearing on my point that is is possible to lose your case in court even when you are in the right.

And we have appeals courts for that. The POINT is that there is a SYSTEM in place for "righting a wrong" and that doesn't involve running from the cops or trying to fight them.
you can still lose in appeals court. My point is that someone might feel that even though they are right, they have no chance in court. So from their perspective, the best thing for them to do is run.

Originally posted by: ferris209
Refer to my sig.


and then refer to mine
deleted, I think I went too far.