Originally posted by: Arnie.d
Ofcourse it would. Why pay more for another analog format if it's more of the same?
Originally posted by: Sweeney599
but all of the formats at the time were analog, so this really wouldn't have made a difference.
Originally posted by: lordjedi
1) an analog format,
1) an analog format,
but all of the formats at the time were analog, so this really wouldn't have made a difference.
Ofcourse it would. Why pay more for another analog format if it's more of the same?
oh my God. (sigh) no, I won't do it . . . Can someone with skills in logic please explain Arnie's logical fallacy to him? I don't have the patience.