Did anybody bother reading the analysis ro the FAQ? It freely admits to not being perfect, and it explains the reason for using ambiguous questions. Again, it is based on European politics, so it is quite a bit off when it comes to US politics. That is why they placed Hilary deep within the conservative section, because to them she is a conservative. I bet if she took this thing on her own, she would be much more on the left side. Hmm, I missed the part where the site claimed to be able to tell you who you should vote for. Also it is kind of funny most people were surprised with their results, I was fully expecting to be somewhere in the middle of the Libritarian section and I ended up almost in the dead center of it. It would be interesting to take the text again and see it you end up in a completely different spot. It would be impossible to have something like this gage you political standing accurately.