Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
I know Clinton is more Authoritarian than I am, but according to that, she's more economically right wing. She wants to make a national health care plan and she's economically right wing? Please.
As I said before, some of the questions don't make much sense. Just look at the first one.
ha,ha,ha,ha,haa spoken like a Republican. Just curious, how would you have worded the question?
I know Clinton is more Authoritarian than I am, but according to that, she's more economically right wing. She wants to make a national health care plan and she's economically right wing? Please.
As I said before, some of the questions don't make much sense. Just look at the first one.
If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.
Why is this an either/or option? What's good for trans-national corporations is good for humanity in general because said corporations produce the goods and services that keep the world running. Now if any corporation is exploiting people unethically for their own ends, then they should be punished. But the question assumes that the profit motive of global companies is somehow intrinsically hostile to the good of humankind, which is ridiculous.
I agree with this. Answering the questions the way they were stated was a pain in the ass. On some of them, I could clearly tell they were geared toward extremes, so I just looked at them from the opposite extreme and answered appropriately.
Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
What's good for trans-national corporations is good for humanity in general
Why is this an either/or option? What's good for trans-national corporations is good for humanity in general because said corporations produce the goods and services that keep the world running. Now if any corporation is exploiting people unethically for their own ends, then they should be punished. But the question assumes that the profit motive of global companies is somehow intrinsically hostile to the good of humankind, which is ridiculous.
I agree with this. Answering the questions the way they were stated was a pain in the ass. On some of them, I could clearly tell they were geared toward extremes, so I just looked at them from the opposite extreme and answered appropriately.
Originally posted by: Sweeney599
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
What's good for trans-national corporations is good for humanity in general
ha,ha,ha,ha,haa spoken like a Republican. Just curious, how would you have worded the question?
Ah yes, because again, as we all know, trans-national corporations are nothing but evil. Pure evil I say! Evil!!!