logo Sign In

Info Wanted: Whats the overall view on the best fan edits ?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Hi, Im interested if there is a general concensus on which fan re-edit is considered the best for the Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones?

The only one Ive seen is The Balance of the Force re-edit which i thought wasvery good sadly i did think the reworkinbg of the subtitles just opened up new problems qhich equally annoyed me over the existing original version problems (“stink up the ship”, “sell the queen”, “butt” etc). Also the use of the word humans seemed out of place in a lot of the subs, Im not sure whether its ever beenmade cllear whether these races r infacr humans or just look like us (a galaxy far far away) Dont get me wrong this guy has been able to do stuff i owul dnever be able to do and his edting really helps the film, it feels more adult, arker and more brutal.

What are the other versions like? Is there an overall favourite ? Is there one that fixes the racist chinesecharacters, anakins immaturity etc but doesnt add new issues?
And i can never find any of these on torrents is there another way of getting trhem ?

Thanks

Author
Time
As a general consensus, Magnolia Fan's edits of the eps 1 and 2 seem to be enjoyed the most. And they are great. I think they take care of most of the concerns you posted.

My favorite is a combination of all three movies called "Star Wars: Fall of the Republic" by blankfist. It's a drastic 4 hour edit. If I remember right ep1 is cut down to 20 minutes. But I liked the paces, and it took care of almost all of my problems with the movie.

Working on: Superman: Son of Jorel

Author
Time
I thought hMagnolia's version was Balance of the Force and was the one with subtitled changes I mention above?

Will check out the version you mention with e four hour edit, is there a dvd qulity torrent anywhere?
Author
Time
There's actually two edits called Balance of the Force. Some other editor used MagFan's titles for some reason. You may in fact be talking about MagFan's edit, but you also may not be. Here is the non-MagFan version.

I used to be very active on this forum. I’m not really anymore. Sometimes, people still want to get in touch with me about something, and that is great! If that describes you, please email me at [my username]ATgmailDOTcom.

Hi everybody. You’re all awesome. Keep up the good work.

Author
Time
Well the version i saw was on youtube, i thought it was very good but i didnt like the new jarjar humour (i mentioned the "stinking up the ship" jokes etc) or the whole slave trade angle, but other than that i thought it was a better cut, am i to presume that the father merrick cut is more faithful to the original movie ?

im intrestin the 4 hour emalgamation mentioned above, just trying to find a dvd quality avi/file of it
Author
Time
I have not seen any other versions, but the "original" fan edit of Ep 2, "Attack of the Phantom" by the Phantom Editor is top-notch. It fixes almost everything that was bad about that movie, it's done very professionally and he has a great commentary track.

He cut around 20 minutes out of the film and it is NOT missed.

Honestly, the main reason I haven't watched any other edit is the running times of them are too close to the original - if you HAVEN'T cut at least 15 minutes out of that movie, I don't think you've hit the mark.

I watched about half of SithLords's Ep 3 "remix" so far and I do like it better than the original. I'd still like to see someone go further.
Author
Time
Why should the running time have any bearing on whether the edit is good or not? ADM reinserted several deleted scenes back into his edits.

“I love Darth Editous and I’m not ashamed to admit it.” ~ADigitalMan

Author
Time
Originally posted by: boba feta
Why should the running time have any bearing on whether the edit is good or not? ADM reinserted several deleted scenes back into his edits.


Right, but ADM's things are extended editions of movies that were already half way decent to begin with. He isn't trying to improve the movies he adds scenes into, he just likes making alternative extended cuts. I understand what Mojo is saying, if it is a movie as crappy as AotC or ROtS no small amount of editing is going to add up to anything. I myself wouldn't put a specific time limit on it, but he is pretty much right. You have got to remove enough of the bad stuff to make it worth while, otherwise what you leave in there will still be enough to kill the film. Though some movies like 300, though not a very intelligent movie to begin with, I think gained a lot by removing (as I did in my personal edit of the film) some of the overly silly "comic book elements" (that ironically were not even in the 300 graphic novel to begin with) which add up to little more than five minutes of screen time. Again, 300 isn't that great of a film to begin with so it is not the best example for short edits benefiting movies, but I am sure it is not the only case. I am sure there are several movies where a couple of dumb moments bring them down considerably.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
I inserted some deleted scenes, yes, but I also took out a ton of garbage when it comes to the prequels. And with Ep III, I did extensive audio work just to get those Battle Droids to stop sounding like sissies. I did a separate round of extended editions for the prequels, but the "ADM Edits" are very much fan edits designed to remove a lot of junk and put in things that never should have been removed. In my own opinion, of course. ;-)
I am fluent in over six million forms of procrastination.
Author
Time
I agree you can't put a "running time" filter on what makes a good or bad fan edit, but with the really offensive movies (like the prequels), I think they need MAJOR re-editing to make a true fan edit (i.e. not just trimming silly stuff here and there, but major restructuring, plot-line removal, etc). Generally these things (as in the case of Attack of the Phantom) lead to significantly shorter running times.

My own work-in-progress cut of "Superman Returns" is about 20 minutes shorter, although the best compliment I got was when I screened it for friends and they said they couldn't tell what was missing.

I see that as a compliment because (to me) that means the essence of the film has been retained, the story still works and no one misses any of the previously existing "bloat."

If course this is what the ORIGINAL edit of all films should be like, but then we'd be out of a job ;-)
Author
Time
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
I inserted some deleted scenes, yes, but I also took out a ton of garbage when it comes to the prequels. And with Ep III, I did extensive audio work just to get those Battle Droids to stop sounding like sissies. I did a separate round of extended editions for the prequels, but the "ADM Edits" are very much fan edits designed to remove a lot of junk and put in things that never should have been removed. In my own opinion, of course. ;-)


I have all 3 of the edits and I like them very much! as a matter of fact, I keep them in the same cases with my originals!
Thank you so much by the way, you do great work!

I am planning on grabbing the extended editions when I have the chance!
lostnorm
Author
Time
ADM, have you redone all 6 episodes??? im trying to find the best fanedits of episodes 5 and 6 and am waiting for the revisited to come out on dvd, i found ep 5 that has your name on it on Pbay but im not sure if its really your work since i cant find it anywhere else......
Author
Time
C3PX said:
... if it is a movie as crappy as AotC or ROtS no small amount of editing is going to add up to anything. You have got to remove enough of the bad stuff to make it worth while, otherwise what you leave in there will still be enough to kill the film.

Yes, unfortunately... Perhaps I should shut up as I've only just seen my 3rd fan edit, and started off with Adywan's Star Wars revisited ("A New Hope" will always be just Star Wars for me ;-) So I'm kind of spoiled.

I just watched the opening of the Phantom Editor's take on Episode 1 and... well, just throwing the worst stuff out doesn't improve the movie generally, it makes the average silly things stand out more because there's less information - superfluous or not - and scenes are shorter (George really outdid himself with silly dialogue and silly storylines in Episode 1, IMHO). There's simply nothing there to replace the silly stuff with. It takes a good or oversized movie to begin with, or a storywise stupid thing like "300" with mindblowing visuals. The best thing that can happen to Episode 1 ist the "silent movie" approach ;-//

Same thing with a MATRIX Reloaded/Revolutions fan cut I recently saw (named "Matrix Evolutions"), it even contained new scenes from the video game, but nevertheless it was a butchered effort at storytelling, not to mention music, flow etc. The problem is, no matter how good the ideas, unless fan editors start to raid movie studios for all those deleted scenes there won't be enough material to reshape a story, and then it takes a pro like Adywan to make it into something to rival the official director's cut. I've tried re-cutting the Matrix 2-3 myself and the problem is, what's missing in the original (a decent storyline for Neo) can't be covered up by cutting other stuff away.

These are just some thoughts, real fans won't be discouraged by the obstacles, of course ;-)

Author
Time

I was turned onto the Slumberland edits via these forums and though they share some points of similarity with other edits they are certainly worth a watch in their own right.

Author
Time
colubra09 said:

The problem is, no matter how good the ideas, unless fan editors start to raid movie studios for all those deleted scenes there won't be enough material to reshape a story, and then it takes a pro like Adywan to make it into something to rival the official director's cut.

Even if there are numerous deleted scenes, that doesn't mean there will be enough footage to tell a better story or that those scenes are an improvement to the story - it all depends on the decisions of the filmmakers/studio and what they choose to film/edit/CG/etc in the first place. I also don't understand why you'd bring up an edit/s needing to be as good as an "official director's cut" since being a DC is no indication that the film will be better (hell, you could argue that Lucas's 2004 DVD release of SW was his "director's cut"...)

Author
Time
JasonN said:
colubra09 said:

The problem is, no matter how good the ideas, unless fan editors start to raid movie studios for all those deleted scenes there won't be enough material to reshape a story, and then it takes a pro like Adywan to make it into something to rival the official director's cut.

Even if there are numerous deleted scenes, that doesn't mean there will be enough footage to tell a better story or that those scenes are an improvement to the story - it all depends on the decisions of the filmmakers/studio and what they choose to film/edit/CG/etc in the first place. I also don't understand why you'd bring up an edit/s needing to be as good as an "official director's cut" since being a DC is no indication that the film will be better (hell, you could argue that Lucas's 2004 DVD release of SW was his "director's cut"...)

The reason we are here is because sometimes a director, editor or studio exec can be so on top of a project they can't see the forest for the trees (or the planks in the case of some actor performances).

The Phantom Editor showed that even without access to the cutting room floor it is possible to improve a scene by cutting even more (look at his take on Anakin's Force test scene) and some of the deleted material that is available does arguably work better than some of the material that wasn't deleted (a prime example being the Mace/Obi Wan conversation scene which was deleted from AOTC vs the Mace/Obi-Wan/floating Yoda scene that wasn't).

So even without Adywan's Adobe skills it is possible to work wonders with what is already to hand.

If you watch Slumberland's take on the Gungan scenes in TPM, Jar-Jar is still Jar-Jar, Boss Nass is still Boss Nass (no re-dubs or subtitles) but they work as designed much better (I wrote this elsewhere on here Jar-Jar actually made me laugh for the first time in a decade thanks to having the majority of his silly scenes removed, it improved the slap-schtick timing).

 

Author
Time
Bingowings said:
JasonN said:
colubra09 said:

The problem is, no matter how good the ideas, unless fan editors start to raid movie studios for all those deleted scenes there won't be enough material to reshape a story, and then it takes a pro like Adywan to make it into something to rival the official director's cut.

Even if there are numerous deleted scenes, that doesn't mean there will be enough footage to tell a better story or that those scenes are an improvement to the story - it all depends on the decisions of the filmmakers/studio and what they choose to film/edit/CG/etc in the first place. I also don't understand why you'd bring up an edit/s needing to be as good as an "official director's cut" since being a DC is no indication that the film will be better (hell, you could argue that Lucas's 2004 DVD release of SW was his "director's cut"...)

The reason we are here is because sometimes a director, editor or studio exec can be so on top of a project they can't see the forest for the trees (or the planks in the case of some actor performances).

The Phantom Editor showed that even without access to the cutting room floor it is possible to improve a scene by cutting even more (look at his take on Anakin's Force test scene) and some of the deleted material that is available does arguably work better than some of the material that wasn't deleted (a prime example being the Mace/Obi Wan conversation scene which was deleted from AOTC vs the Mace/Obi-Wan/floating Yoda scene that wasn't).

So even without Adywan's Adobe skills it is possible to work wonders with what is already to hand.

If you watch Slumberland's take on the Gungan scenes in TPM, Jar-Jar is still Jar-Jar, Boss Nass is still Boss Nass (no re-dubs or subtitles) but they work as designed much better (I wrote this elsewhere on here Jar-Jar actually made me laugh for the first time in a decade thanks to having the majority of his silly scenes removed, it improved the slap-schtick timing).

 

The only thing I dislike about that Mace/Obi-Wan scene is that the effects are either temp or are put together hastily for the DVD release. You can see softening around the edges of the characters which is a quick way to key things without showing matte lines. The background CG is also paltry. It would be great if someone like Ady could restore that scene and make it fit in better with the rest of the film.

 

Author
Time
Bingowings said:

The reason we are here is because sometimes a director, editor or studio exec can be so on top of a project they can't see the forest for the trees (or the planks in the case of some actor performances).

The Phantom Editor showed that even without access to the cutting room floor it is possible to improve a scene by cutting even more (look at his take on Anakin's Force test scene) and some of the deleted material that is available does arguably work better than some of the material that wasn't deleted (a prime example being the Mace/Obi Wan conversation scene which was deleted from AOTC vs the Mace/Obi-Wan/floating Yoda scene that wasn't).

So even without Adywan's Adobe skills it is possible to work wonders with what is already to hand.

Which is exactly the point of my last post.

 

Bingowings said:

If you watch Slumberland's take on the Gungan scenes in TPM, Jar-Jar is still Jar-Jar, Boss Nass is still Boss Nass (no re-dubs or subtitles) but they work as designed much better (I wrote this elsewhere on here Jar-Jar actually made me laugh for the first time in a decade thanks to having the majority of his silly scenes removed, it improved the slap-schtick timing).

Hmm, I haven't seen Slumberland's edits yet, but you've peaked my curiousity (a better Jar-Jar would be great, but hopefully that also extends to a better Anakin as well)

Author
Time
ADigitalMan said:I inserted some deleted scenes, yes, but I also took out a ton of garbage when it comes to the prequels. And with Ep III, I did extensive audio work just to get those Battle Droids to stop sounding like sissies. I did a separate round of extended editions for the prequels, but the "ADM Edits" are very much fan edits designed to remove a lot of junk and put in things that never should have been removed. In my own opinion, of course. ;-)

 

could someone PM me torrent links of these? Perhaps a better seeded torrent of the Slumberland edits too? Thank would be much appreciated as Revisited and the two Phantom edits have gotten me more or less addicted to fan edits.

Author
Time
 (Edited)
JasonN said:

 

Bingowings said:

If you watch Slumberland's take on the Gungan scenes in TPM, Jar-Jar is still Jar-Jar, Boss Nass is still Boss Nass (no re-dubs or subtitles) but they work as designed much better (I wrote this elsewhere on here Jar-Jar actually made me laugh for the first time in a decade thanks to having the majority of his silly scenes removed, it improved the slap-schtick timing).

Hmm, I haven't seen Slumberland's edits yet, but you've peaked my curiousity (a better Jar-Jar would be great, but hopefully that also extends to a better Anakin as well)

Some of Anakin's scenes are improved but there is still room for further improvement.

I've yet to see an edit that pulls the best ideas together.

The idea of redubbing the Trade Federation is great from Magnoliafan (though I don't like the garbled speach used in that edit the subtitles making them darker slave traders is genius). Keeping Jar-Jar a funny clot but actually funny (from Slumberland), Anakin is better in The Phantom Edit (here I reach the outer edge of my Phantom Menace edit knowledge). ADM made a great job of putting deleted material back in.

Giving the battledroids sinister voices is something that has yet to be pulled off convincingly in my experience (though trimming has been done well in a couple of the versions I've seen).

Hopefully when Adywan comes to do his he will borrow from the best and add his own polish as Octorox suggests.

 

 

Author
Time
Bingowings said:

I've yet to see an edit that pulls the best ideas together.

The idea of redubbing the Trade Federation is great from Magnoliafan (though I don't like the garbled speach used in that edit the subtitles making them darker slave traders is genius). Keeping Jar-Jar a funny clot but actually funny (from Slumberland), Anakin is better in The Phantom Edit (here I reach the outer edge of my Phantom Menace edit knowledge). ADM made a great job of putting deleted material back in.

Giving the battledroids sinister voices is something that has yet to be pulled off convincingly in my experience (though trimming has been done well in a couple of the versions I've seen).

Sounds great!  You should Womble it together and release it.  :)

Working on: Superman: Son of Jorel

Author
Time
Bingowings said:

The idea of redubbing the Trade Federation is great from Magnoliafan (though I don't like the garbled speach used in that edit the subtitles making them darker slave traders is genius). Keeping Jar-Jar a funny clot but actually funny (from Slumberland), Anakin is better in The Phantom Edit (here I reach the outer edge of my Phantom Menace edit knowledge). ADM made a great job of putting deleted material back in.

Giving the battledroids sinister voices is something that has yet to be pulled off convincingly in my experience (though trimming has been done well in a couple of the versions I've seen).

Hopefully when Adywan comes to do his he will borrow from the best and add his own polish as Octorox suggests.

Maybe I'll take a look into doing such a project after I finish my "Starkiller Saga" edits of Ep2 & Ep3 (though I might be dead tired of SW by that time).

As for the droids, I actually liked the idea of removing their voices like Phantom Editor did in his edits.

Author
Time
 (Edited)
JasonN said:
Bingowings said:

The idea of redubbing the Trade Federation is great from Magnoliafan (though I don't like the garbled speach used in that edit the subtitles making them darker slave traders is genius). Keeping Jar-Jar a funny clot but actually funny (from Slumberland), Anakin is better in The Phantom Edit (here I reach the outer edge of my Phantom Menace edit knowledge). ADM made a great job of putting deleted material back in.

Giving the battledroids sinister voices is something that has yet to be pulled off convincingly in my experience (though trimming has been done well in a couple of the versions I've seen).

Hopefully when Adywan comes to do his he will borrow from the best and add his own polish as Octorox suggests.

Maybe I'll take a look into doing such a project after I finish my "Starkiller Saga" edits of Ep2 & Ep3 (though I might be dead tired of SW by that time).

As for the droids, I actually liked the idea of removing their voices like Phantom Editor did in his edits.

The battledroids don't need to speak to each other (though it would be nice to have them make some sort of coded noise like the probots) but when they speak to other creatures they should sound menacing.

I'd go for the silent angle if they looked menacing (like the Cylons in NuGalactica) but they look skeletal so it would be nice if they had hissing clicky voices (turning them into ghostly wraiths) rather than sounding like Looney Toons characters.

The Superbattledroids in AOTC and ROTS are more substantial and don't need to talk at all but I think they should make more of a stomping noise when they march.