logo Sign In

Post #306527

Author
Yoda Is Your Father
Parent topic
Should have General Grevious been a reconstructed Darth Maul?
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/306527/action/topic#306527
Date created
16-Jan-2008, 8:09 AM
I voted yes. However:

If we are talking about going back in time to alter the Episode 3 script (and therefore the final movie), I would say eliminate Greivous altogether, he was fucking pointless and served no purpose.

But if George said 'No, I really want there to be some kind of cyborg villain in Episode 3 who has 8 arms and shit then in that case I would say 'well let's make him Darth Maul back from the dead' - It ties the episodes together, saves us from the introduction of yet another character, and also suggests that Palpatine was dabbling in cybernetics before Vader. Greivous/Maul would be a prototype for Vader, in a way.

If we are talking about trying to make a fan-edit that converts greivous into a ressurrected Maul I would again say no - I don't think it's do-able.