logo Sign In

Post #306292

Author
Erikstormtrooper
Parent topic
Should have General Grevious been a reconstructed Darth Maul?
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/306292/action/topic#306292
Date created
14-Jan-2008, 12:30 PM
I vote Yes.

Maul being Grievous gives Grievous some depth, and makes him not so much of a throwaway character. It would also show that Palpatine has a history of resurrecting his apprentices and putting them in mechanical suits.

I think Dooku actually works better as a tragic figure who is misled, instead of a genuine Sith apprentice.

But when it comes to making all this happen in an edit of Episode III, I have serious doubts that something can be done in a convincing matter.