logo Sign In

Indecision2008 Name Your Canidate — Page 4

Author
Time
Originally posted by: sean wookie


It's hard to ignore the facts about Islam. But then again which of the 3 can be called a peaceful? Christianity was spread by means of warfare. And the old testament probably isn't anything peaceful either.



Yeah, there is no denying that some pretty terrible things have been done in the name of Christianity. But keep in mind, this is a corruption of religion, not an aspect of the religion itself. Jesus is the guy who rebuked Peter for cutting off the ear of one of the guys who came to arrest him (Peter was obviously aiming for the guys neck, but he must have ducked which resulted in him only loosing his ear as opposed to his entire head), and reattached it, then went to his death peacefully. This is the kind of behavior Christianity teaches. As for the old testament, no there are no orders for Jewish folowers to go out and kill people in the name of Yahweh. Though in the history sections of the Old Testament God instructs the Israelites to go to war, but these are historical accounts and are not telling followers of the Jewish faith to wage war. The Koran teaches to go to war for the sake of spreading Islam, which is why you see what you see today. At one point they had a powerful Empire with plenty of wealth and power to spread their teachings by the sword, now that Empire is gone and alternative methods must be used.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
Yes, there were dark times in Christian history, but they pale to what the Muslims have wrought. Even if the Islamics were to wipe out every other religion (or lack thereof--remember that, atheists) and converted them over to Islam, their horror and terror would still continue on their own subjects!! Is that a religion of peace?

There is justification for war in the bible. Basically it says it would be completely irresponsible to allow someone to destroy you and your religion. Therefore it says self-defense, guard and protect. I, as a Christian, don't want all of the Islamics wiped out---never---I want to protect my beliefs and prevent them from taking away my religious right. America protects those rights (so far), and therefore, I support the stance on the WOT.
Author
Time
Thompson impressed the hell out of me with his "hand shows" comment, really put me on the floor. This is the Thompson I thought I was getting in September. If he'd been doing this kind of thing since he announced, I'm sure he'd be polling at the top every time. According to the polls, many folks who originally supported Thompson are lingering over to Huckabee, mostly because Thomson hasn't been as we thought he'd be. Anyways, I am pretty much pulling for both Thompson and Huckabee, either way is WAY better than a Romney or Giuliani. Romney is just so fake to me and Guiliani's liberal social ideas just scare me along with his weak ass record on illegals, but I love his great stance on Terrorism.
Author
Time
I can't get behind Huckabee. In many ways he's more left than Clinton.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Dug
I can't get behind Huckabee. In many ways he's more left than Clinton.


How so?
Author
Time
Okay, I may have exaggerated, but let's start with this:

He's pro-amnesty.

First off, there was a bill in the senate for Arkansas that would have required proof of citizenship for voting and required state agencies to report cases of suspected illegal immigrants. Huckabee shot it down.

Huckabee also proposed a bill that would offer state funded scholarships and state benefits to illegal aliens.

Huckabee also supported the McCain-Kennedy Senate bill to give amnesty to illegals. Claims God supports the bill (...uuhh, okay). Made public statements that those who oppose the bill are "racist" and "bigoted."


Huckabee wants to grant clemency to repeated DWI offenders, and it has been hinted at that significant campaign contributions may have influenced this decision.

Huckabee has proposed tax hikes and then lied saying he didn't.

And then there's this whole thing about releasing a rapist which I haven't read up on yet.

And Huckabee's latest criticism of Bush sounds like eeevery other Democrat in the last seven years.

And then his foreign policies which sound just like the faux pas Obama made ("Invade Pakistan, reach out to Iran")--WTH!!

Oh, and I'd like to add he's completely clueless on public education.

I knew there was something wrong with him, and I was right, especially when the media has dropped Giuliani like a hot potato and getting behind Huckabee. Something is very, very wrong. The media WANTS to have Huckabee as the Republican candidate so he's not any kind of threat against Hildebeast or Obama.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Dug
Okay, I may have exaggerated, but let's start with this:

He's pro-amnesty.[\q]

Not true, taken from ontheissues.org

Q: What do you think should be done with the 12 million undocumented aliens that live in the US?

A: The first step is a secure border, because otherwise nothing really matters. But I do think the pathway has to include people going to the back, not the front of the line. There can't be an amnesty policy, because that's an insult to all the people who waited, sometimes, ridiculously, for years, just to be able to make the transition here. If you can get an American Express card in two weeks, it shouldn't take seven years to get a work permit to come to this country in order to work on a farm. So if our government is incapable of making that process in that length of time, then we should do it in a way to outsource it. And here's why: When people come to this country, they shouldn't fear. They shouldn't live in hiding. They ought to have their heads up, because we believe every person ought to have his or her head up and proud.
Source: 2007 Republican primary debate on Univision Dec 9, 2007


First off, there was a bill in the senate for Arkansas that would have required proof of citizenship for voting and required state agencies to report cases of suspected illegal immigrants. Huckabee shot it down.

I think there may be more to the story, I am researching further but here is an excerpt from mikehuckabee.com
Claim: "Huckabee also opposed legislation to require proof of citizenship in order to obtain public benefits and vote." (Associated Press, 2/3/05)

Fact: Thompson appears not to have read the entire Associated Press article. Governor Huckabee opposed this bill, because the issues addressed in the bill were already established by current law:

"But Huckabee said it's just not true that illegal aliens are receiving welfare, food stamps and other public services.

'Anyone aware that they are should alert the attorney general's office or the prosecutors office, because that's fraud,' he said." (Associated Press, 2/3/05)

The Governor's point was that illegal immigrants were already prohibited from receiving state benefits, thus there was no need to rehash the issue. The only point of the legislation was to inflame passions against Hispanics.

No illegal immigrants were able to receive "public benefits" from the state of Arkansas . Governor Huckabee specifically pointed out that if anybody knew of that happening, they should turn the illegal immigrants in for violating the law.


Huckabee also proposed a bill that would offer state funded scholarships and state benefits to illegal aliens.

More to this I know for sure
Claim: "As Governor, Mike Huckabee championed an effort in Arkansas to give in-state tuition at state colleges and taxpayer-funded scholarships to illegal immigrants."

Fact: In Arkansas Governor Huckabee supported broadening a particular merit scholarship -- not in-state tuition – to include high-achieving children who were applying for citizenship. This put these students on the same footing as permanent resident aliens, who have always been eligible for the scholarship.

The proposal to make children of illegal immigrants eligible for in-state tuition was not part of the Governor’s plan and did not pass.

The scholarships were intended to encourage all Arkansas children to work hard and excel academically. Since Arkansas has a constitutional obligation to educate all students, illegal and legal, through 12th grade, Governor Huckabee believed it was in the best interest of the state to encourage a select few (roughly 30 students would have been eligible) to continue their education. Unlike tuition discounts, the scholarship was merit-based and, because of the strict academic and financial need criteria, only open to a small number of students.

Any illegal students who wished to participate in the scholarship application process had to submit their application for citizenship. Having these students continue to their education would have enabled them to become “tax-payers” for the state rather than "tax-takers."

This debate once again highlights the difficult position that our nation's governors have been put in by the failures of the Federal Government. If immigration laws already in place had been enforced, governors would not be required to make decisions on how to simultaneously slow the inflow of illegal immigrants into their state while also trying to ensure that they are not left with increasing numbers of "tax takers."


Huckabee also supported the McCain-Kennedy Senate bill to give amnesty to illegals. Claims God supports the bill (...uuhh, okay). Made public statements that those who oppose the bill are "racist" and "bigoted."

Not true at all from everything I've read, from http://knowyourvote.googlepages.com/mikehuckabee

Huckabee has claimed that border security is his first priority. He supported the recent appropriations bill providing training and deployment of additional border patrol agents, the expansion of the border fence, and the deployment of technology-based monitoring systems along the border. He has stated that the border should be sealed. He also supports the establishment of a tamper-proof ID card to verify immigrants’ work eligibility. Huckabee opposed the recent comprehensive immigration reform bill (defeated by the Senate in June), stating that “the bill offers amnesty and should not be approved” because illegals “must take responsibility for their actions." However, during an interview with George Stephanopoulos, Huckabee implied that immigrants should be granted a path to citizenship if they pay penalties and thus accept responsibility for entering the U.S. illegally.

He also opposed the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill due to its lack of transparency and concerns about the fiscal cost of reform.

Interestingly, Huckabee has sympathized with the social needs of illegal immigrants. He advocated prenatal care for pregnant immigrants and proposed a scholarship program for illegals that graduate from Arkansas high schools.


Huckabee wants to grant clemency to repeated DWI offenders, and it has been hinted at that significant campaign contributions may have influenced this decision.

I'm still researching this, so far I have found some evidence this may be true, which saddens me, but I will get the full facts and forward them on ASAP

Huckabee has proposed tax hikes and then lied saying he didn't.

I reviewed all the associated tapes and interviews involving this deal. I am willing to give the Governor the benefit of the doubt that he did not outright "lie" as the left wing bloggers would have you believe. I think he flubbed it by saying the wrong thing, to his credit he did correct it in a press release.
And then there's this whole thing about releasing a rapist which I haven't read up on yet.

And Huckabee's latest criticism of Bush sounds like eeevery other Democrat in the last seven years.

I don't think they are necessarily left wing talking points he spouts out, but are proven mistakes that the Bush Administration made.

And then his foreign policies which sound just like the faux pas Obama made ("Invade Pakistan, reach out to Iran")--WTH!!

Yes, they do bring the Carter Presidency to mind, I agree, we need to make him aware of how ignorant they are.

Oh, and I'd like to add he's completely clueless on public education.

How so?

I knew there was something wrong with him, and I was right, especially when the media has dropped Giuliani like a hot potato and getting behind Huckabee. Something is very, very wrong. The media WANTS to have Huckabee as the Republican candidate so he's not any kind of threat against Hildebeast or Obama.

I agree the media is embracing Huckabee, and that merits suspicious, but I think it is because of their distorted views. I think they believe that since he is a Christian, he is weak. They believe if he makes it to the general election that they can start pounding his knees with the fact he is religious and that he would run a faith based government. IN their minds this could cuase him to lose, but they tend to forget that I believe 90% of the United States are Christians. I agree with you also that they believe him to be a easier win for Hellary or Obama, but I think he could surprise. I basically fully support Huckabee AND Thompson right now, I just wished Thompson would have the vigor and ambition that Huckabee is spewing all over the place. Thompson, as great as he is, is just boring the hell outta people, and sadly the reality is that a lot of folks won't vote for him because they are bored by him, regardless of how great his points of views are. Restating myself from earlier, if Thompson had been doing what he did on the last debates with the "hand show" comment all along, I think he'd be in Huckabee's polling position right now.


Author
Time
Originally posted by: Dug
Okay, I may have exaggerated, but let's start with this:

He's pro-amnesty.

First off, there was a bill in the senate for Arkansas that would have required proof of citizenship for voting and required state agencies to report cases of suspected illegal immigrants. Huckabee shot it down.

Huckabee also proposed a bill that would offer state funded scholarships and state benefits to illegal aliens.

Huckabee also supported the McCain-Kennedy Senate bill to give amnesty to illegals. Claims God supports the bill (...uuhh, okay). Made public statements that those who oppose the bill are "racist" and "bigoted."


Huckabee wants to grant clemency to repeated DWI offenders, and it has been hinted at that significant campaign contributions may have influenced this decision.

Huckabee has proposed tax hikes and then lied saying he didn't.

And then there's this whole thing about releasing a rapist which I haven't read up on yet.

And Huckabee's latest criticism of Bush sounds like eeevery other Democrat in the last seven years.

Oh, and I'd like to add he's completely clueless on public education.

I knew there was something wrong with him, and I was right, especially when the media has dropped Giuliani like a hot potato and getting behind Huckabee. Something is very, very wrong. The media WANTS to have Huckabee as the Republican candidate so he's not any kind of threat against Hildebeast or Obama.


Not that I'm behind Huckabee, but I think you need to be aware of a few things.

1. The courts have overturned similar laws in every other state deeming them unconstitutional. So, was Huckabee suppose to support it, only to have it overturned? Maybe yes, but if it is unconstitutional (I don't believe it is btw), then he would be supporting something that's unconstitutional. I don't want someone who will do that.

2. He didn't release a rapist. Yes, he recommended the guy be released on parole, but that apparently also entails some form of monitoring. He specifically denied the request to commute the sentence. So it was actually the parole board, with appointees from Bill Clinton and another governor, that released the guy.

3. He's clarified those statements. What he's saying is that instead of having a "you're with us or against us" attitude, we need to have such a strong military that no one would dare stand against us. That is exactly what Reagan did and it's one of the reasons the Soviets fell. They simply couldn't keep up with our level of military strength and spending.

Like I said, I don't necessarily support Huckabee, but you should at least know all the facts before making a decision. I don't support Giuliani or McCain either. I mostly support Fred Thompson. I don't know exactly how I feel about Romney.
F Scale score - 3.3333333333333335

You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American.

Pissing off Rob since August 2007.
Author
Time
Interestingly, Huckabee has sympathized with the social needs of illegal immigrants. He advocated prenatal care for pregnant immigrants and proposed a scholarship program for illegals that graduate from Arkansas high schools.

Um...those illegals shouldn't be there in the first place. Shouldn't he get them out of the state rather than give them incentive to stay. Right there just proves that actions speak louder than words. If he's sincere about border security and no-amnesty, he shouldn't have allowed this. Sounds cruel, yes, but actions aren't matching the words.

I reviewed all the associated tapes and interviews involving this deal. I am willing to give the Governor the benefit of the doubt that he did not outright "lie" as the left wing bloggers would have you believe. I think he flubbed it by saying the wrong thing, to his credit he did correct it in a press release.

Okay, that's fine. I can forgive him for a flub in his speeches, but this says to me, especially if liberal bloggers are pushing this lie about him, then they're setting him up for the 'big fall.'

Any illegal students who wished to participate in the scholarship application process had to submit their application for citizenship. Having these students continue to their education would have enabled them to become “tax-payers” for the state rather than "tax-takers."

This still reads like a benefit given to an illegal who still in this country! Where is the hardline of "hey, get out, you're illegal." This still reads like an incentive to sneak into this country and partake in our system. Dang it, at what point do we actually punish them for actually breaking the law and flouting our sovereignty?

Yes, they do bring the Carter Presidency to mind, I agree, we need to make him aware of how ignorant they are.


Huckabee is being compared to Carter quite often, which is another reason I don't want him. Carter is the epitome of a failed administration and policies.

Oh, and I'd like to add he's completely clueless on public education.


How so?


He's too supportive of it. Didn't he pass a law that put a lot more restrictions on homeschooling than during Clinton's term as governor? Things I read about him seems to want to grow and expand the public school system. The schools have so much money it's just staggering! Yes, Bush is doing the same kind of things, and I'm unhappy with that as well. Stop growing the school systems! They don't need as much money as people think they do.

Yes, they do bring the Carter Presidency to mind, I agree, we need to make him aware of how ignorant they are.


Isn't it a little late to give Huckabee a primer on Foreign affairs? Shouldn't he have known this already? I don't want a president who is confused about who is an enemy and who is an ally. (Or maybe they do know this--and that would scare me more).


Right now I'm going to trust my gut instincts on Huckabee and not support him. Being a Christian, you'd think I'd be more supportive of him, but I just don't. I support Thompson, but like you say, wish he'd show more energy, more enthusiasm, but he has the right criteria for me to be a viable candidate. I really do wish people would consider Duncan Hunter. He hits all the marks.
Author
Time
Whether he's a liar or not, Huckabee has a history of supporting tax increases and welfare programs. He's not someone a real conservative would ever pick. I agree that Romney is similarly flawed, but I would argue that's he's not quite as bad. The biggest area to distrust Romney is on abortion, but to the degree that he'll affect abortion (say in terms of judges) I can't see him doing a bad job. I'd rather support the guy who'll fight for tax cuts and free market principles; I see Romney and Giuliani being better in this regard.

Otherwise, Thompson all the way.

"Now all Lucas has to do is make a cgi version of himself.  It will be better than the original and fit his original vision." - skyjedi2005