I've been following this conversation in the other thread, and I definitely sympathize with the viewpoint. Ultimately, though, I voted no without much hesitation. I was introduced to the Star Wars Trilogy in that form. Like many others here, after becoming more aware of the real history of Star Wars, I began to see the original movie in a new context, now renewed to me as a standalone movie, which is was, even though I'd been fed the "one movie that had to be cut into three parts" line from George and believe it for years. So now I've finally been able to experience Star Wars for what it originally was: an amazing good vs. evil morality tale set into space. And it works great that way, maybe even better than in the trilogy context; equal to at the very least. But every time I watch Star Wars, I immediately follow with the other two movies. It's just that when I watch it now, I don't think of them as parts I, II, and III to a trilogy. I think of Star Wars as a film, and the other two as sequels to that film. But I love ESB far too much to let it go, and I don't really have to keep from thinking of all the crap that's come since, just like I don't have to think about all the other series when I watch the original series of Star Trek.