Originally posted by: C3PX
It shows. In our past signitures as well as your current one, and in a good deal of your posts.
Why is the concept of giving up something good for something better such a shocking/insane/idiotic one? The guy made some great movies, then nothing but Star Wars. He had a lot of great potential. Too bad it was never fully tapped into. I would have liked to see what this up and coming young director could have done as he matured, but instead of Star Wars remaining just one of many impressive films he had done, it became a creative constipation.
If that is so insane, then show me to my rubber room because I'm as mad as a hatter.
Originally posted by: JediRandy
And how'd you know I'm a "gusher"?
And how'd you know I'm a "gusher"?
It shows. In our past signitures as well as your current one, and in a good deal of your posts.
Why is the concept of giving up something good for something better such a shocking/insane/idiotic one? The guy made some great movies, then nothing but Star Wars. He had a lot of great potential. Too bad it was never fully tapped into. I would have liked to see what this up and coming young director could have done as he matured, but instead of Star Wars remaining just one of many impressive films he had done, it became a creative constipation.
If that is so insane, then show me to my rubber room because I'm as mad as a hatter.
So ESB is "good"? Not great, not the best SW film... just "good". Anyway isn't ESB the one with the least GL interference? At least that's what is always thrown around SW message boards.