Originally posted by: C3PX
Oh, well I only guest it might have been a copy paste because it felt incomplete. Its fallacy lies in the fact that there has to be a common Word of God from which all three are interpreting in their own way, like Court Justices with the Constitution. In your analogy there is no "Constitution" from which these three religions are interpreting from. There was the Hebrews collection of holy scriptures, which predates both Christianity and Islam. Then you have Christianity branch off of Judaism, with Christ coming and claiming that he is the son of God and the Messiah come to fill Jewish prophecy. Then several hundred years later Muhammed is born and invents Islam by taking aspects from both Judaism and Christianity in order to get people to die for his cause. So yes, they are all related, but they are far from different interpretations of one "Word of God", rather it is that each is built off the others before it.
Oh, well I only guest it might have been a copy paste because it felt incomplete. Its fallacy lies in the fact that there has to be a common Word of God from which all three are interpreting in their own way, like Court Justices with the Constitution. In your analogy there is no "Constitution" from which these three religions are interpreting from. There was the Hebrews collection of holy scriptures, which predates both Christianity and Islam. Then you have Christianity branch off of Judaism, with Christ coming and claiming that he is the son of God and the Messiah come to fill Jewish prophecy. Then several hundred years later Muhammed is born and invents Islam by taking aspects from both Judaism and Christianity in order to get people to die for his cause. So yes, they are all related, but they are far from different interpretations of one "Word of God", rather it is that each is built off the others before it.
God is just a sadistic ass hole IMO. If it exists that is.