1. You're using a "think of the children" question to validate socialized medicine. You continue to narrow the scope of the question while keeping it focused on children. Here's my answer: Why don't the parents have health insurance? Are the parents drug addicts? Would the child be better served in another home? Do the parents not have any friends or family? This is why large social circles are important. People should not depend on the government to bail them out. Plan for the future. Plan for the worst, hope for the best. This is why people have insurance (health, life, car, home, etc). Nobody wants to get sick/in a car accident/die, but if they don't plan for these things, someone else is going to have to foot the bill.

You're full of shit on this question. You went from parents not having insurance to abandoned children (per your reply to Chaltab). Obviously an abandoned child can be taken care of. Get them into a good, stable home and you probably won't have to worry about uninsured parents. By the way, not all forms of cancer or heart defects are cureable, so stop fooling yourself and others.

2. I told you before I don't know. I wasn't avoiding the question, I've simply never given it any thought. I don't see any problem with it on the surface. Then again, I happen to believe that children need a father and a mother.

3. No. I think Clinton would score better on a charisma test and I think he gets along better with the ladies, but that's about it.

4. Sure, discretely. Nobody has a problem with the ones that do it discretely. It's the ones that want to whip it out for the world to see that most people have a problem with. Hell, even my sister was borderline "whiping it out" when she fed her kids. Yeah, it was a little disturbing, but I never saw anything. My other sister, on the other hand, takes her kids to another room where she can have some privacy.

5. This is a State's rights issue and yeah, it should be left like that. Are you suggesting that people shouldn't try to get the law changed? I disagree with that. But yeah, it should remain a State's rights issue.

6. Scrubs of course.

Once again, none of this has anything to do with common sense (aside from the first question). Everything else is just a matter of opinion. You've picked items that probably mean a lot to you and now you're forming an opinion of me (and some others) based on our answers. We obviously don't hold the same opinions as you. We might come to the same conclusions sometimes, but that's probably based on different reasoning.