Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
I enjoyed the first two quite a lot, though the first one is undoubtedly superior in every way.
The third one I have mixed feelings on. While I enjoyed some aspects of it, there wasn't nearly enough of it taking place in the matrix itself and I hated the fact that everyone from the first film but Morpheus is dead. And yet the Superman fight between Neo and Smith almost makes up for its shortcomings in my mind.
I guess 'cheated' is a good word for it. The first film set my expectations very high and the Wachowski's failed to deliver on them completely.
I enjoyed the first two quite a lot, though the first one is undoubtedly superior in every way.
The third one I have mixed feelings on. While I enjoyed some aspects of it, there wasn't nearly enough of it taking place in the matrix itself and I hated the fact that everyone from the first film but Morpheus is dead. And yet the Superman fight between Neo and Smith almost makes up for its shortcomings in my mind.
I guess 'cheated' is a good word for it. The first film set my expectations very high and the Wachowski's failed to deliver on them completely.
I kind of have the same feelings. I enjoyed the frst two, but the third is so-so. I love some parts, but absolutely hate other parts. The Battle of Zion was utter crapt in my oppinion. I enjoyed the Architect scenes, but hated the Battle of Zion. I know it is wierd. The parts in the matrix are the best though, because there are less limits as to what can be done. The Neo-Smith fight was good, but had one to many water ball explosions.