In terms of this threads topic, I'm personally for government spending that reduces carbon emissions in ways that are purely positive. Such as encouraging more efficient technologies and nuclear power. However, some of the solutions, like ethanol fuel, actually don't help anybody (except maybe corn farmers) and that's even assuming that carbon emissions are a truly deadly threat (which is a hypothesis that I currently lean away from myself).
In terms of this threads topic, I'm personally for government spending that reduces carbon emissions in ways that are purely positive. Such as encouraging more efficient technologies and nuclear power. However, some of the solutions, like ethanol fuel, actually don't help anybody (except maybe corn farmers) and that's even assuming that carbon emissions are a truly deadly threat (which is a hypothesis that I currently lean away from myself).