logo Sign In

Info Wanted: Is anybody capturing Star Trek Remastered ?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Hi, guys, it is Star Trek’s 40th birthday and as a special gift to all Trekkies a new version of the classic was made with digitall cleanup and CG special effects. Because I’m not from US I can’t record these new aired episodes myself, so I hope somebody is capturing them All I could find on internet were 12 episodes in crappy DivX / XVid. Does anybody here have it complete / or in better quality ?

Also a completely different question - does anyboy have the mono tracks for these episodes ? Because the official DVDs have a brand new 5.1 track

Author
Time
The Original Series is gonna be released on HD-DVD in the latter half of this year.
Author
Time
Which version ? The original with mono sound, the original with 5.1 sound or the remastered version ? Last time I checked startrek.com there was written that the remastered version will probably NOT be released
Author
Time
Originally posted by: pittrek
Which version ? The original with mono sound, the original with 5.1 sound or the remastered version ? Last time I checked startrek.com there was written that the remastered version will probably NOT be released


The only option is the remastered version, as obviously that's the only source that would actually be HD. As far as audio...I'd imagine that it's 5.1, seeing as how they've already released the series utilizing that audio on DVD.

http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/01/19/cbs-plans-first-hd-dvd-release-star-trek-tos/
Author
Time
So who is right ?
Because on the official website http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news/article/23775.html
you will find this :

The first question we can already answer for you: There is no confirmation as yet IF, or when, these episodes will eventually appear on DVD, HD-DVD or Blu-Ray. This is likely to change at some point.
Author
Time
That article you're quoting is from August of last year, whereas the one I linked to is from January of '07. And it looks like right now this release is on the down-low, not quite ready for an official announcement (probably because, like all big releases, it'll be pushed back a quarter or two).

Edit: Actually, it looks like there was an official announcement in January:
http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/CES_2007/Disc_Announcements/CES:_HD_DVD_to_See_300_New_Titles_in_2007/417

Firing the opening high-def salvo of this year's Consumer Electronics Show, the North American HD DVD Promotions Group held a press conference late Sunday, with format-supporting studios previewing several high profile new disc titles to come in 2007.

Though exact specs and street dates are still to be announced, primary HD DVD backers Universal Studios Home Entertainment, Warner Home Entertainment and Paramount Home Entertainment released an impressive short list of some of their most highly-awaited new and catalog releases due in 2007.

....

TV on HD DVD will also heat up in 2007, with Warner/HBO issuing more of 'The Sopranos' in season-by-season sets, plus the new Battlestar Galactica' from Universal, and as expected from Paramount, the original series of 'Star Trek,' which was digitally remastered and retooled in HD late last year.


And I mean, seriously, did you expect them to go through all the work of transferring that series to HD, and NOT hop at the chance to make some quick cash? But anyways, there you go--it was announced.
Author
Time
the original series of 'Star Trek,' which was digitally remastered


So it isn't the original series. Why do I start to feel that it's gonna end like Star Wars ? The 97 Special Edition was originally planed to be just a cinema-only release, and suddenly it replaces the originals. I'm afraid Star Trek will die the same way
Author
Time
What do you mean? In your initial post you claimed that the HD versions were what you wanted.

And the Original series is available in at least on dvd so it's not like what happened with the OT special editions. In any case I'm sure we'll hear something at least once this begins to wrap up.

As far as the audio tracks, are there major differences between the mono and surround?

Author
Time
As far as the audio tracks, are there major differences between the mono and surround?


Well, obviously, the show wasn't filmed in 5.1...the surround sound audio is a remix of the original mono (and I imagine, probably the introduction of rerecorded audio effects).

As far as being pissed about it not really being the "original" series, how are you surprised, pittrek? You KNEW that the HD remastered series had had new effects introduced, yet you were still requesting that they be captured. Now you hear that they're doing a commercial release of those episodes, and you're pissed.

As has been pointed out, the series is available in good quality on DVD--not even close to the fucked up Star Wars situation. Secondly, the original model effects look like crap--not just the effects themselves, but the film quality. They're grainy and scratchy as hell, from what I recall. You won't get any more quality out of them. The only thing that'll look better in HD is the shots of the actors, so hell, why not throw in some new effects that'll actually look half-way decent in HD, secure in the knowledge that the original effects have been preserved for eternity in good quality on DVD.
Author
Time
Pittrek is probably worried that they'll only release the new-visuals version, and with the ridiculous changes made for the DVD's 5.1.

I read something that claimed it'd be available in both versions, but I don't know if that was official. They hadn't decided, then, if they'd also offer a version that was cropped to widescreen.

I hope the new ship effects will be improved before they release it, but they aren't giving themselves much time.


The TOS dvd's are pitiful compared to the film. They used to sell film clips from the dailies, and I've seen loads them projected.

(In contrast to the dvds of TNG and most seasons of Voyager & DS9, which were taken from the crappy broadcast master tapes).

The TOS dvd's are not a decent preservation. Look at how they botched the barrier effects on the viewscreen in Where No Man Has Gone Before". Look at all the faded scenes. Terrible transfer. Not as bad as the GOUT, but pretty bad. Artifacting is bad, too.


The HD remaster, of TOS, is awesome. It looks like the olden days, before the faded prints & piss-poor transfers. (Even the 35 mm prints that they struck for syndication, back in the 80's, looked faded). The cleanup of dirt doesn't ruin the authenticity, in my mind. The new transfer is infinitely more accurate.

Also, the film used for TOS was much more fine-grain that that used in the new serieses, making it perfect for HD. Reviews & screenshots of the XBox downloads of TOS HD and Enterprise HD show that Enterprise's film scenes are softer. The same will be true for TNG, Voyager, and DS9. (The film-grain part is confirmed, for DS9, by interviews of the production staff of Trials & Tribbleations). They will, of course, have to be re-special-effects-ed, or at least re-composited because the visual effects were done directly to tape).


If they used a 3-pass transfer scan, for TOS, then the space-shots should look quite good, as they used to, back in the day.

One day I found... 10 years had got behind me. Next day was worse.

 

Download  shows from Cable DVR (Updated! Yes, it needs a rewrite, but it's worth slogging through, anyway).

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Johnny Ringo

As far as the audio tracks, are there major differences between the mono and surround?


They did a great job of remastering the sound, in the dvds, and they restored at least one missing line (Balok, in "The Corbomite Maneuver").

But then they screwed up the bridge sound effects. They mixed in the sound effects that were used for Pike's bridge, (and for the other starships). And they often threw in in sound effects that belonged on other parts of the ship.

The original series had a limited sound effect library, and recycled some of the off-ship sounds. But they took great care to have consistant background sounds for each major room on the ship, as well as consistant sound for the primary equipment.


The 5.1 was made possible by the fact that the "mono" tracks, in those days, were 3-track (speech, music, sound effects). And the music seems to have been mixed from the original multi-track recordings that the mono was mixed-down from.



Off topic, but by the way, you know how the laugh track was too loud in MASH? Comedies put the "laugh track" in the sound effects track. That made it easy for some bozo to decide to make it obnoxious).

One day I found... 10 years had got behind me. Next day was worse.

 

Download  shows from Cable DVR (Updated! Yes, it needs a rewrite, but it's worth slogging through, anyway).

Author
Time
JT : Yes, exactly, I agree with everything. I want to have BOTH versions, but I prefer the ORIGINAL version (the same as Star Wars) - I simply like that I can choose which version will I watch.
And tweaker, why do you think I'm pissed ? I'm just seeking information

Secondly, the original model effects look like crap--not just the effects themselves, but the film quality.


Well it sounds like we both were looking at completely different shows, because I think the same about the new version. The CG models look completely fake, too CG. In my oppinion Star Trek didn't need this kind of "improvement' - the original models were great. There are many other things which needed to correct and I'm happy they DID correct it (usually hand-drawn phaser blasts). Also the image quality is terrible, but it is probably because I am watching them as DivX movies, of course the HD version will look better
Author
Time
I do most of my rips as XviD, but usually slightly higher quality than most, say, "scene" rips.

Thing is I keep forgetting about STv2 :/

"Right now the coffees are doing their final work." (Airi, Masked Rider Den-o episode 1)

Author
Time
The CG models look completely fake, too CG. In my opinion Star Trek didn't need this kind of "improvement' - the original models were great. There are many other things which needed to correct and I'm happy they DID correct it (usually hand-drawn phaser blasts). Also the image quality is terrible, but it is probably because I am watching them as DivX movies, of course the HD version will look better


You know, I was just looking at some comparison videos of the effects, and I have to say, some of the CG does look really bad. And they changed the angles of the shots from the angles used in the model shots, when the original setups actually looked a hell of a lot better than the CG shots. Jesus, people can take a good idea and fuck it up. Up to now, the limited number of updated effects I'd seen looked pretty good, compared to the old grainy exterior model shots, but...what I just saw kinda mellowed out my enthusiasm.

Hmm...maybe a choice wouldn't be such a bad idea?

Jaiman: You're say that all the series (TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager and Enterprise) were shot on film? For some reason, I thought that a couple of the later series had been shot on videotape. But you're saying that the live action shots were caught on film, then transfered to tape along with the effects? I'd hope so, because TNG looks like ass.

Oh, and you were talking about the film clips from the dailies...are you saying that those actually looked pretty good?
Author
Time
I have only seen a few eps of the remaster Star Trek and I must say, I was expecting something completely different. I thought they would kind of special edition them and add hi-tech CG ship models and made them look more modern. Instead from what little I have seen they just made crappy looking CG versions of the original models. I must say the picture does look good though, but I really don't like those CG models. From what I had read the only reason they redid the models was to transfer the episode to HD, which the original space scenes were too low quality to put in HD. If that is the case then it is understandable that they make them just like the old models, but they seriously look awful. Really seems like they are rushing them.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Molly
I do most of my rips as XviD, but usually slightly higher quality than most, say, "scene" rips.

Thing is I keep forgetting about STv2 :/

Darn. I would love to see better caps than we're getting. I, also forget, a lot of times, to watch it on Saturdays at 4:00~5:00~6:00 (whenever they get around to it), because I'm a news junky. These caps suck in comparison to the broadcasts.

And if they do upgrade some of their poorer new-effects work, it'd make an interesting curiosity for preservation.

One day I found... 10 years had got behind me. Next day was worse.

 

Download  shows from Cable DVR (Updated! Yes, it needs a rewrite, but it's worth slogging through, anyway).

Author
Time
Originally posted by: tweaker
Jaiman: You're say that all the series (TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager and Enterprise) were shot on film? For some reason, I thought that a couple of the later series had been shot on videotape. But you're saying that the live action shots were caught on film, then transfered to tape along with the effects? I'd hope so, because TNG looks like ass.

Yeah, the series live-action was shot on film. At least the bulk of the live action... In "Best of Both Worlds", I see evidence that some viewscreen shots, and perhaps some regular live action, may have been done on videotape (the interlacing is 60 unique fields per second) . The shots involving transporter effects appear to have been videotaped as well. OTOH, what I'm seeing might be explained by 30-fps film cameras, and entire sequences run through the effects-computers and then put to tape. I seem to recall reading (in a book/magazine) that the computer-painted transporter effects, in the early days, were photographed straight off of the computer monitor, but I can't find the source.


Anyway, to save money, they did all their visual effects, compositing, and titles, for TNG through Season 4 of Voyager, with primitive hardware, and primitive computers. Then they output that directly to tape. They did the final editing to tape along with it. Up until the last couple of seasons of Voyager, they used D2 tape for the broadcast master - vastly better than VHS, but still crap. (I don't have an official source on "D2" but a credible source says he got it direct from Paramount Dvdscan article. It says that Seasons 5, 6, & 7 of Voyager went to Digital Betacam.

The pre-CGI new-series stuff was awful. The alien ships were dinky miniatures, hastily lit. There were a variety of compositing/effects techniques used. But painfully primitive stuff. I've had the displeasure of going over a few scenes of TNG "Best of Both Worlds" (both parts) frame by frame, over & over, doing some work for a project. The Enterprise-D looks nice, but everything else... wow...



Oh, and you were talking about the film clips from the dailies...are you saying that those actually looked pretty good?


Oh yes. Dailies, mind you, not the final prints. Even the model shots. Another thing confirmed in those DS9 interviews, was that the film density was high. That means you didn't generally see the flaws from the matting process - those dissapeared into the black of space, unless you set the projector a few inches away from the screen (a sheet of white paper, in my tests). The Enterprise wasn't a washed-out blue with faint shadowing, it had a nice gradation of midtones into healthy shadows.

I had a few of those clips myself, but they faded to pinks and purples.

That isn't to say that the smalller miniatures were lit convincingly, especially in the first season. There were several sizes of Enterprise miniatures. When they used the tiny ones, you could tell. But the lighting on the large miniatures looked pretty darn good.

Of course the original's stock shots got tedious, but the current round of CGI typically does variations on the stock shots, with no regard to coming up with similarly attractive camera angles. And they don't spend much effort on achieving convincing movement. (The original series didn't have the camera technology to do much with ship movements).

On the other hand, the CG is being done in widescreen, the camera angles might look better that way. Eurogamer Xbox HD downloads screenshots The article.


I'm blown away by the new effects work on the landscapes. (Although they effed up on the window shots - they tracked the original. In the original, when the camera moved across the room, it became painfully obvious that there was a painting on the set wall, a few feet away. The view outside the window should only shift slightly when you move across a room). Norman's (I, Mudd) access panel was a huge upgrade. The Mirror Mirror hand-agonizer lightning was horribly misguided (it didn't use primitive electrical sparks), but the funky effect that Checkov seemed to lean into, in the agony booth was awesome. And the phaser fixes & such are very welcomed.

Also, for a shabby as the ship effects are, the planets, in the orbit shots, are beautiful.


But the new-effects ships never look as good as DS9's best CG, nor hold a candle to Enterprise's CG. And many shots look ghastly - like test shots before the final render. Two different guys did a better job, than CBS, on The Doomsday Machine. Daren R. Dochterman. (I had a link to the other guy, but the site has been moved or taken down. I'll try to remember to try to dig it up).


Originally posted by: C3PX
Really seems like they are rushing them.

That may be the problem. I've read several opinions that they are rushing to get them out in time for airing.

That's why I'm holding out hope for upgrades of some of the "upgrades".

And CBS is doing them in-house. They really need to be farming the space effects out to special effects houses that have experience with it.

One day I found... 10 years had got behind me. Next day was worse.

 

Download  shows from Cable DVR (Updated! Yes, it needs a rewrite, but it's worth slogging through, anyway).