I made it like it should have been from the start, no personal attacks, I tired to, sorry if there are any Tip.
Originally posted by: Tiptup
As for what you said about "getting emotional over video games" and being "nutty," I stated no logical fallacies in response to that. With the normal, logical understanding of your statement, you clearly communicated that people who "get" emotions about a games are being "nutty" in your "opinion." As you said, you "indirectly" called me nutty. Nowhere did I discuss the "direct" or "indirect" nature of your words; therefore, you make a clear logical fallacy when you accuse me of such. (Is this making sense to you?)
Direct and Indirect statements are implied.
You did say that though, its right there (above). By stating so, this also implies you believe it as well. You believe a response of “Fuck you too” to be lighthearted otherwise you would not have said it and then tagged it as a lighthearted response.
Originally posted by: Tiptup
If you actually go back and look, you will see that I said, "Fuck you too." This can easily be understood as lighthearted by virtue of the fact that you never said "fuck you" first (and thus my reply was silly),
This may be debated but something gets lost in the translation when done online, its not real life. Say someone was giving a speech and said something that these people are crazy for one reason or another and someone in the crowd raised their hand and said I have a question “your crazy,” that’s silly. Now using that same situation replace “your crazy” with “fuck you,” two clearly different situations and possible outcomes.
As for what you said about "getting emotional over video games" and being "nutty," I stated no logical fallacies in response to that. With the normal, logical understanding of your statement, you clearly communicated that people who "get" emotions about a games are being "nutty" in your "opinion." As you said, you "indirectly" called me nutty. Nowhere did I discuss the "direct" or "indirect" nature of your words; therefore, you make a clear logical fallacy when you accuse me of such. (Is this making sense to you?)
Direct and Indirect statements are implied.
Originally posted by: Tiptup
I didn't say "fuck you" by itself, nor do I believe "fuck you" to be lighthearted on its own
You stated that “if I cant make a lighthearted reply” which was “Fuck you too”
The “too” at the end does not make it any less of a direct statement to the person you replied to. The “too,” simply says I am saying Fuck you, to you (me) since something you (I) said got to me (you).
Originally posted by: Tiptup
(in general). In fact, you're the one making another logical fallacy by stating that I believed or said that.
I didn't say "fuck you" by itself, nor do I believe "fuck you" to be lighthearted on its own
You stated that “if I cant make a lighthearted reply” which was “Fuck you too”
The “too” at the end does not make it any less of a direct statement to the person you replied to. The “too,” simply says I am saying Fuck you, to you (me) since something you (I) said got to me (you).
Originally posted by: Tiptup
(in general). In fact, you're the one making another logical fallacy by stating that I believed or said that.
You did say that though, its right there (above). By stating so, this also implies you believe it as well. You believe a response of “Fuck you too” to be lighthearted otherwise you would not have said it and then tagged it as a lighthearted response.
Originally posted by: Tiptup
If you actually go back and look, you will see that I said, "Fuck you too." This can easily be understood as lighthearted by virtue of the fact that you never said "fuck you" first (and thus my reply was silly),
This may be debated but something gets lost in the translation when done online, its not real life. Say someone was giving a speech and said something that these people are crazy for one reason or another and someone in the crowd raised their hand and said I have a question “your crazy,” that’s silly. Now using that same situation replace “your crazy” with “fuck you,” two clearly different situations and possible outcomes.
To wrap up, if we wanted to get really technical you committed the fallacy of ad hominem (against the person). Which is ultimately the biggest logical fallacy and there is no way of getting around that your reply was totally flawed from the beginning with the initial response of “Fuck you too.”