Originally posted by: skyjedi2005
it will not duplicate or even read in my dvd burner. so much for promising to pif it if i can't even watch it on my dvd player without my player saying it's corrupt.
A corrupted version appears to have made its way onto usenet, so if you try to get it off of alt.binaries, make sure it's the one labeled "new menu" (that is apparently the correct one - I don't know, I haven't downloaded it myself). Of the dozen or so originals I sent out, I haven't heard any complaints. If someone is pif-ing the corrupt one, that would be, er, unfortunate.
I never thought super 8 looks so awful thank god I never bought a projector or 8mm reels. the quality is close to starkillers 77 bootleg in places better others worse.
it will not duplicate or even read in my dvd burner. so much for promising to pif it if i can't even watch it on my dvd player without my player saying it's corrupt.
A corrupted version appears to have made its way onto usenet, so if you try to get it off of alt.binaries, make sure it's the one labeled "new menu" (that is apparently the correct one - I don't know, I haven't downloaded it myself). Of the dozen or so originals I sent out, I haven't heard any complaints. If someone is pif-ing the corrupt one, that would be, er, unfortunate.
I never thought super 8 looks so awful thank god I never bought a projector or 8mm reels. the quality is close to starkillers 77 bootleg in places better others worse.
8mm can be excellent - these prints obviously weren't, and I traded off graininess for brightness and color. I imagine one of those anamorphic 8mm prints would look considerably better, particularly with a better (i.e., rank wet-gate) transfer. Mine's made with a WorkPrinter (www.moviestuff.tv), so it's scratches and all - but at least it's frame-by-frame.