I don't belive such an organization to be something like a tax shelter excuse to grab donner's and sponsor's money, but they are plagued with hypocrisy all the way. What I don't want to mix up here is this organization, to which I do not support at all, and the whole theory about protecting animals, to which I partially support. While I'm not against using non-endagerous species for food and clothes or medical tests (unless it's something really cruel and without porpouse) I support those who are against it and I'm all for protecting endagerous species, something that Greenpeace has done quite well. PETA's pretty much unnecessary, if you think about it.