Originally posted by: C3PX
Chaltab, which one would you suggest, seasons or ages? Or which one is suppose to take place first chronologically? This is why I never bought them before, because there where two and I never knew which to get. If there would have been only one of them to start with, I think I would have bought it long ago. The two games at once reminded me to much of the Pokemon thing.
Well, they're both excellent games. Ages is more puzzle heavy and is more difficult throughout most of the game. Seasons focuses more on combat and is a bit easier until the final boss. Chronologically, they literally happen in whatever order you play them in; once you beat one of them, you get a password that allows you to continue the story to the next game, including taking some items with you and getting to face the True Final Boss. (For this reason, Zelda timeline speculators tend to group them together as OOX.)
And, sorry, Chaltab, maybe he didn't know Zelda already. It's been five and a half years since I've played them (I need to play them again), so I forgot. But I have one more question for you. I've never played Minish Cap before, so what puts it as the very first Zelda chronologically? I'm just curious.
Chaltab, which one would you suggest, seasons or ages? Or which one is suppose to take place first chronologically? This is why I never bought them before, because there where two and I never knew which to get. If there would have been only one of them to start with, I think I would have bought it long ago. The two games at once reminded me to much of the Pokemon thing.
Well, they're both excellent games. Ages is more puzzle heavy and is more difficult throughout most of the game. Seasons focuses more on combat and is a bit easier until the final boss. Chronologically, they literally happen in whatever order you play them in; once you beat one of them, you get a password that allows you to continue the story to the next game, including taking some items with you and getting to face the True Final Boss. (For this reason, Zelda timeline speculators tend to group them together as OOX.)
And, sorry, Chaltab, maybe he didn't know Zelda already. It's been five and a half years since I've played them (I need to play them again), so I forgot. But I have one more question for you. I've never played Minish Cap before, so what puts it as the very first Zelda chronologically? I'm just curious.
The game tells the origins of Vaati from the Four Sword games; nobody seems to have heard of the Triforce or the Master Sword. The game revolves around forging your White Sword into the Four Sword. There is no Death Mountain, and the Gorons in the game say they used to live in the only mountain in the game, Mt. Crenel, which is in the North West, whereas Death Mountain is usually in the North East (Even in Twilight Princess it's in the East in the GC version). Also, there is only one Hero of Legend, the 'Hero of Men', who doesn't wear cap; the finale of the game has Ezlo (formerly your hat, now humanoid again) passing his cap on to you, as if this Link is the first to wear the green cap.