Originally posted by: WESHALLPRESERVE
I don't have respect for defeatests that claim they are on the same sides as humanity, nor do I have no resepct for people that say that their religion calls for the death of anyone that is not associated with it.

So, you claim to be a defeatest when it comes to not killing, that you have to kill them before they kill you. Which is pretty much advocating the killing of people who do not share -your- beliefs.

I can see the point about killing someone in self defense. My point is we ended up acting on the paranoid assumption (one the was never substantiated) that they had weapons of mass destruction.

At what point is it "obvious" that we need to defend ourselves?