Originally posted by: The Bizzle
and III and IV shouldn't even be introduced into the equasion here, as far as comparison to Returns. There's no way anyone's going to convince me they have any appreciation of the craft of filmmaking and then go on to say Superman Returns isn't as good as III or IV. That's either nostalgia taking over, or a gross misunderstanding of what makes a decent film.
and III and IV shouldn't even be introduced into the equasion here, as far as comparison to Returns. There's no way anyone's going to convince me they have any appreciation of the craft of filmmaking and then go on to say Superman Returns isn't as good as III or IV. That's either nostalgia taking over, or a gross misunderstanding of what makes a decent film.
No, III and IV weren't good movies, but the issue I have with this is that they DO exist. Singer deciding that he is going to do a 'pseudo' sequel to II, and pretend that III and IV don't exist is silly. They may suck, but instead of just ignoring them, start their own continuity.