80% is not a "bitter fanboy" exagerration, its a reasonable estimation. If you think thats a ridiculous number, i suggest you actually research what has been updated in the SE; I'm sure the figure is more like 70% or so when you account for the fly-by insert shots that take up a few frames, but its a reasonably accurate number.

And no, this is not about models versus CG, SE versus OOT or any of that stuff--I've noticed that such bitter, pro-Lucas resentment is a reflection of the mindset of the poster who views everything as an attack against LFL. My point was that its ironic and a damned shame that a book that chronicles the breakthrough model work is reinforced by a film that doesn't even contain the pinnacle examples of said modelwork breakthrough, and that it is another example of the Lucasfilm conspiracy to suppress the OOT--these are all facts, not opinion. LFL does not make or lend out OOT prints, only the SE, and it is indeed illogical that the film being screened doesn't even contain most of the shots but CG replacements. Its fucking stupid and i cant see why anyone would be so fucking deluded as to argue otherwise.