Originally posted by: BeeJay
The LaserDisc quality is not piss-poor quality, like a lot of people try to say. Of course it doesn't rank up with truly restored digital viewing, as it would have if they used the original negatives as the baseline for the September release.
By the same token, the old LaserDisc releases were rather crisp, don't you think?
Not if it were to be projected on to an even modestly sized cinema screen, no. Especially if compared with a 35mm print. The LaserDisc quality is not piss-poor quality, like a lot of people try to say. Of course it doesn't rank up with truly restored digital viewing, as it would have if they used the original negatives as the baseline for the September release.
By the same token, the old LaserDisc releases were rather crisp, don't you think?