Originally posted by: auximenies
I knew you'd misunderstand that, but I didn't feel like spelling out everything for you the first go 'round. So here you go. The thing that I don't feel strongly about one way or the other was if Adywan shared the clip with everyone or not. Which is why I didn't post anything such as this:
"Heh. I'm sure glad that none of those people that didn't donate can't access the video clip."
nor this:
"Aw, c'mon Adywan. Please share the clip with everyone."
Why post anything at all on the subject.
Originally posted by: auximenies
The thing I DO feel strongly about is respecting a decision by someone who is a "giver". And by respecting I mean not publicly questioning or evaluating the merit of said decision. That was the nature of my original response to your post.
I knew you'd misunderstand that, but I didn't feel like spelling out everything for you the first go 'round. So here you go. The thing that I don't feel strongly about one way or the other was if Adywan shared the clip with everyone or not. Which is why I didn't post anything such as this:
"Heh. I'm sure glad that none of those people that didn't donate can't access the video clip."
nor this:
"Aw, c'mon Adywan. Please share the clip with everyone."
Originally posted by: auximenies
You don't see us petitioning Adywan to make the clip available to everyone either, do you?
You don't see us petitioning Adywan to make the clip available to everyone either, do you?
Why post anything at all on the subject.
Originally posted by: auximenies
The thing I DO feel strongly about is respecting a decision by someone who is a "giver". And by respecting I mean not publicly questioning or evaluating the merit of said decision. That was the nature of my original response to your post.
Could have used PM's or not said anything at all
But in discussing the merit of the choice adywan has made publicly with me on this forum that wouldn’t fall into the category of “not publicly questioning or evaluating the merit of said decision.”
Interesting take