This is the main point I have issues with though:
Of course, it is not that hard to not post links to that "other website" but that is not point. The question is, is it right to ban links to that "other website" and let people like dinkins and others do all they do? I do not believe so. Perhaps it does create a feud, but is the feud created when the link is posted, or by its deletion?
You can feel free to quote the Constitution all you want, but this whole "freedom of expression" thing that the FE-ers have been touting does not apply here. This forum is a private institution that Jay pays for, and as a result, he can censor whatever the hell he wants. He had personal issues with a website, and that's his right to do that. If I remember correctly, he asked people to remove the links, but they refused. He therefore deleted the links for them because they didn't do what he asked of them, and so they bitched and moaned about freedom of speech and all this other stuff and eventually left. Jay is not at fault here.
Again, sorry I blew up at you. I'm just starting to get sick of this stuff. I would've thought people here would've been mature enough to move on by now. Apparently I was wrong.