Originally posted by: klokwerk
The compromise in #13 is that the "S" looks a little funny at the top, however it isn't that bad. I think it is this logo's quirk. I use that word as somebody described every OT logo as having its own quirks - I agree.
Actually, the thin "S" bar mimics the thin top "E" bar on the TESB logo. So there is precedent.
Originally posted by: klokwerk
The "S bar" as I've come to call it is still too thick in this version though, I think. Does everyone agree I should make the bar thinner and then have the bottom bar the same thickness?
The compromise in #13 is that the "S" looks a little funny at the top, however it isn't that bad. I think it is this logo's quirk. I use that word as somebody described every OT logo as having its own quirks - I agree.
Actually, the thin "S" bar mimics the thin top "E" bar on the TESB logo. So there is precedent.
Originally posted by: klokwerk
The "S bar" as I've come to call it is still too thick in this version though, I think. Does everyone agree I should make the bar thinner and then have the bottom bar the same thickness?
Definitely not. Any thinner would look even "quirkier". I believe this is the best thus far.