Originally posted by: vote_for_palpatine

Everyone take notes here:
"I'd rather hear from OUT fans here" = mandate
"I don't agree with Go-Mer's perspective on Star Wars" = mandate.
Wow. Some logic.

You're also saying that Go-Mer is a "problem" and calling his opinions an "infection" that has "spread."

I would, however like an answer to this:

The underlying tone of your responses is interesting. I've done nothing more than call it like I see it. Yet, you respond as though I have some sort of power to make people do what I want. Why do you feel this way?

When I'm in a debate of this nature, I tend to respond to one person as if I'm responding to an entire group. You may find that to be a faulty and possibly unfair way to argue, but it's convenient. Why should I shoot down the "This is OT.com it's only for OUT fans" arguement again and again for each person that plays that card when I can just find one major example of it and call it into question precisely once? Go-Mer may have the time and inclination to do that, but I'm a fan of taking whatever route has the fewest steps, since ultimately the results are better in the end.

Also, I've been a member longer than Go-Mer. Do I get a mea culpa from you?

Sure. mea culpa coffee?