logo Sign In

Post #251800

Author
auraloffalwaffle
Parent topic
For me...it all came out in the end...
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/251800/action/topic#251800
Date created
17-Oct-2006, 4:04 PM
I was referring to the wider implications of your remarks. I actually said something about it in the 'What do u think of the PT' thread, but it got lost and you never responded.

I've heard these arguments you put forward so many times. That the films are for children or for "open-minded" people and that, because I "fell in love" with the OOT when a child, I couldn't see the flaws in it. Not only that, but that I still can't see the flaws in it and that that means that my expectations were so high for the PT that they could never live up to them.

Bollocks.

I can distinguish between what is good or bad in what I used to watch as a child. Some things I appreciate as good children's entertainment, some things I recognise as crap and some things I enjoy as an adult, with no qualification of what that means. The OOT, for me, fall into that last category. I do not claim that they are perfect. I wouldn't include them in a top-ten of the best films ever made. But they definitely occupy a priveliged place in my favourite films I've seen and probably always will do.

Why should the OOT be treated as such a special case?

As I asked in the other thread (and I'm still waiting for an answer), I still watch Labyrinth and The Princess Bride now. Is that because I can't see the flaws in them? And I enjoyed Superman and Superman II as a child. Does that mean that I won't be able to watch Superman Returns with my adult mind? Do I have to regress to the level of a child to enjoy films, Go-Mer-Tonic?