Originally posted by: Guy Caballero
Shaw having hair and his limbs doesn't mean anything. ObiWan is also not cut in half, or naked. "The good part" of Anakin notion doesn't fly with me. He's not Sybil, he's not Dr. jekyll. There aren't "parts". He's just Anakin. He's not reverting back to a former personality, he's the same guy, just continuing FORWARD without being a Sith asshole.
Shaw having hair and limbs makes him somehow different from the guy we see in the unmasking scene. Either he's been given his limbs and hair back, or he was supposed to look like he did before he ended up needing the suit to survive. The way Lucas changed it makes me think the original intention was the latter. He had two distinct personalities. One who gave with no thought of reward, and one who took with no worry of return. It's the same guy, but he was once a good guy, and then became an agent of evil. I'm just saying that to me Hayden represents the personality he had before he became evil.Shaw having hair and his limbs doesn't mean anything. ObiWan is also not cut in half, or naked. "The good part" of Anakin notion doesn't fly with me. He's not Sybil, he's not Dr. jekyll. There aren't "parts". He's just Anakin. He's not reverting back to a former personality, he's the same guy, just continuing FORWARD without being a Sith asshole.
You say he's the same guy only he's no longer a Sith lord, but then where did his limbs and hair come from if he didn't go back to how he was before he lost that stuff?
I don't see why you have to get so angry about how I feel about it.