Originally posted by: Darth_Evil
Actually, Wikipedia is always very reliable. I disagree, whenever I go to Wikipedia and look up a page about something I'm familiar with I always find at least one error I need to correct. Check out the page on Glass... "Glass is a uniform amorphous solid material" is the very first thing said! So much for being neutral. There is a real debate over whether glass is classed as an "amorphous solid" or a liquid. "One common misconception is that glass is a liquid... Glass is generally treated as an amorphous solid rather than a liquid, though different views can be justified since characterizing glass as either 'solid' or 'liquid' is not an entirely straightforward matter." Again, so much for neutrality.And for the record....it's spelled Blu-Ray, not Blue-Ray, and this news is very old.
For the record YOUR != YOU'RE.Actually, Wikipedia is always very reliable. I disagree, whenever I go to Wikipedia and look up a page about something I'm familiar with I always find at least one error I need to correct. Check out the page on Glass... "Glass is a uniform amorphous solid material" is the very first thing said! So much for being neutral. There is a real debate over whether glass is classed as an "amorphous solid" or a liquid. "One common misconception is that glass is a liquid... Glass is generally treated as an amorphous solid rather than a liquid, though different views can be justified since characterizing glass as either 'solid' or 'liquid' is not an entirely straightforward matter." Again, so much for neutrality.And for the record....it's spelled Blu-Ray, not Blue-Ray, and this news is very old.
Also, one of the problems with Wikipedia is that people edit out the truth and put what they think is right in there. And if enough people think their version is right, then it stays... Wikipedia just ends up with the popular POV, not the truth - and it's certainly not neutral.